this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2024
1065 points (94.1% liked)

Political Memes

5413 readers
4472 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DMBFFF@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Such a person can compete in womens sports FAIC.

wp:Swyer syndrome

A 2017 study estimated that the incidence of Swyer syndrome is approximately 1 in 100,000 females.[22] Fewer than 100 cases have been reported as of 2018. There are extremely rare instances of familial Swyer syndrome.[23][24]

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You are defining 'woman' by whether or not sports officials decide they can compete with other women? And then you try to use science afterward?

[–] DMBFFF@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

I think anyone who defines wt:thonself as a woman should be able to compete in any Olympic event as a woman.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You do know that we can see your post history, right?

But this 'thon' thing is very droll. I'm sure you think you've done a real gotcha with it.

[–] DMBFFF@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

As one who dislikes the singular they—I kinda like distinctions in regards to numbers in pronouns—I kinda like "thon."

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Again, everyone can see your post history.

Not only can everyone see your post history, they can see the posts you've made in this thread.

https://lemmy.world/comment/11956439

So why you're even attempting this nonsense is beyond me.

[–] DMBFFF@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I kinda wished English 2nd-person pronouns made distinctions for plurality. We know they exist with 1st-person pronouns, but alas, the so-called progressives are ruining plurality in 3rd-person pronouns.

I suppose we could take it up a notch and replace all gender-specific 3rd person pronouns with the singular they.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Cool. That has nothing to do with all the queerphobic shit you're spreading all over this comment section.

[–] DMBFFF@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

What "queerphobic shit."

I neither fear nor hate the transgender, and most of their detractors are conservative bigots and/or idiots.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] DMBFFF@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

No, because you say bigoted things like:

Rachel Dolezal isn’t black, but Caitlyn Jenner is a woman.

Don’t argue: if you argue you are a transphobe.

I'm not blind.

[–] DMBFFF@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

If a white man says he's a woman, we should accept that thon is a woman.

If a white man says he's black, he should be pilloried for mocking people of African descent.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Once again, you seem to think I'm blind.