this post was submitted on 23 Aug 2024
218 points (96.2% liked)

Map Enthusiasts

3348 readers
167 users here now

For the map enthused!

Rules:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] snooggums@midwest.social 61 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (8 children)

Within a year of the decision Texas implemented discrimatory voting laws, proving that the federal oversight really was necessary.

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 3 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

What was the content of the discriminatory voting laws?

[–] snooggums@midwest.social 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

https://apnews.com/article/voting-rights-act-supreme-court-black-voters-6f840911e360c44fd2e4947cc743baa2

Within hours of a U.S. Supreme Court decision dismantling a key provision of the Voting Rights Act, Texas lawmakers announced plans to implement a strict voter ID law that had been blocked by a federal court. Lawmakers in Alabama said they would press forward with a similar law that had been on hold.

Voter ID laws for voting are discriminatory in practice in the US, especially in southern states for a mulitide of reasons including barriers to getting the IDs, easily losing them due to discriminatory law enforcement, and many minorities not getting them for other reasons.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)