this post was submitted on 23 Aug 2024
218 points (96.2% liked)

Map Enthusiasts

3348 readers
167 users here now

For the map enthused!

Rules:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] snooggums@midwest.social 61 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

Within a year of the decision Texas implemented discrimatory voting laws, proving that the federal oversight really was necessary.

[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 13 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Which was obvious to everyone but those paid not to see it

Truth is denied those who seek it with both eyes closed.

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

What was the content of the discriminatory voting laws?

[–] snooggums@midwest.social 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

https://apnews.com/article/voting-rights-act-supreme-court-black-voters-6f840911e360c44fd2e4947cc743baa2

Within hours of a U.S. Supreme Court decision dismantling a key provision of the Voting Rights Act, Texas lawmakers announced plans to implement a strict voter ID law that had been blocked by a federal court. Lawmakers in Alabama said they would press forward with a similar law that had been on hold.

Voter ID laws for voting are discriminatory in practice in the US, especially in southern states for a mulitide of reasons including barriers to getting the IDs, easily losing them due to discriminatory law enforcement, and many minorities not getting them for other reasons.