this post was submitted on 23 Aug 2024
250 points (98.8% liked)

Games

32384 readers
991 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Not sure where the official announcement of this happened, but videos and discussions of the game are now finally allowed. The game is still invite-only, but expect to start seeing it all over the place now. Popular streamers are already jumping into it.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] dormedas@lemmy.dormedas.com 54 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

There may be more people watching Deadlock than there are watching and playing Concord today based on available data and reasonable extrapolation. Valve continues to market in a unique way that works.

[–] simple@lemm.ee 31 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

Concord is dead on arrival. Kind of a shame, the game looked a bit interesting but being $40 and having very generic art this was bound to happen. Deadlock is in a whole other league.

[–] Phegan@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Agreed. Why would they force you to pay 40 in a genre already overpopulated and most of them are free.

[–] Katana314@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

It’s basically impossible to increase the price tag on a game like that, and if you go free, the design pivots to a lot of abusive monetization systems. People run into that at the 10th hour of any free game.

It might be failing for a lot of reasons - I don’t think that one is necessarily their mistake though.

[–] ltxrtquq@lemmy.ml 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Honestly, paying for a (primarily) multiplayer game isn't a problem for me. I actually might prefer it when you look at Overwatch vs Overwatch 2. But I wasn't about to sign up for a playstation account to play my Steam game.

[–] sneezycat@sopuli.xyz 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You're talking like ow2 isn't literally the same game. I paid for ow1 and can't go back to it.

[–] ltxrtquq@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 months ago

I think that's what makes it such a good point of comparison though. It's titled differently and we were promised it would be different, but all that really happened was they changed their monetization tactics. And maybe it's just nostalgia, but I remember liking Overwatch when it came out, but now I have almost zero interest in playing Overwatch 2, even though I've gone back to it a few times just to give it a try.

[–] ngwoo@lemmy.world 14 points 2 months ago

It's likely that Concord's lifetime peak will be lower than Deadlock's closed beta peak

[–] Carighan@lemmy.world 14 points 2 months ago

I mean, I did not even know a game called Concord exists.