this post was submitted on 27 May 2024
8 points (100.0% liked)

Programmer Humor

32733 readers
597 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] qwerty@discuss.tchncs.de -1 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Why are online casinos bad? I don't understand this pervasive need some people have to force their way of life on others and take away their agency over their own lives. It comes off to me as some kind of superiority complex. "They're too stupid to make their own decisions, I know better what's best for them, I must protect them from themselves".

[–] PoliticalAgitator@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Sounds more like you just don't know anything about the gambling industry. They run rigged games in predatory ways. They happily let organised crime launder money for a cut. They fight regulations designed to reduce problem gambling.

Nevertheless, nobody here is "forcing their way of life on others and taking away their agency over their own lives". They're just acknowledging that casinos have a long history of being absolute cunts.

[–] qwerty@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Who's "they"? I don't know much about the gambling industry but if it's anything like any other industry then it's not a centralized monolith but many independent business. As long as the founding principles aren't inherently corrupt (and in the case of casinos they aren't. Nobody is forced to play and everyone knows the house has an advantage and in the long term is guaranteed to win. Because of this it doesn't make sense for the house to cheat and risk getting caught, it will win anyway.) there is no reason to think that the majority of the industry engages in criminal activity. This is a massive generalization.

[–] PoliticalAgitator@lemmy.world 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I don't know much about the gambling industry

You can stop there. You don't know much about the gambling industry, defending them was just an opportunity to tell us your opinions on "some people", none of whom are actually here.

[–] qwerty@discuss.tchncs.de -1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Yes, my comment wasn't about online casinos but about the people who think they have a right to tell others how to live their lives. I'm not defending the gambling industry, I think gambling is stupid. I'm defending the right of the people to make their own decisions.

My "defense of the gambling industry" was just me pointing out that as long as something isn't inherently nonconsensual and the terms and conditions are clear there is no reason to forbid other people from doing it just because you disagree with it.

[–] PoliticalAgitator@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

Nobody in this thread has forbidden anyone from doing anything. If you want a soapbox for your irrelevant opinions, start a blog.

[–] sudneo@lemm.ee -1 points 7 months ago

They run rigged games in predatory ways.

I don't know what you mean by this. Games have a fixed margin which is usually disclosed or can be computed (exactly like the 0 and 00 in the roulette skews the odds in the house's favor if you want to do just black/red). There are then whole chapters in national regulations about random number generators to ensure the odds are correct and the games are not rigged (i.e., a game certified for 98% should have that outcome). Are games designed to have the house win a 2,5,7,9% margin? Sure, but this is out there in the open, there is nothing to "rig" in the same way having 0 or 00 is not "rigging" a game of roulette.

They happily let organised crime launder money for a cut.

At least in Europe, you get audited quite often and AML regulations are very tight. Laundering money via online gambling companies with their cooperation seems quite unlikely to me (and inefficient, possibly, but I don't know).

They fight regulations designed to reduce problem gambling.

Some do, but not all, and not in all cases. Addicts are bad for business for gambling companies, or at least for some of them, moderate long-term customers are generally better (and require way less effort).

I don't know what you know about gambling, I definitely think that the ethics are questionable, and I left the industry when I could also for those reasons, but the company I worked for was not very bad in this regards. Maybe you worked/had experience with some of the shady ones (like those who operate in illegal markets using a single license from a random tiny country)?

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Why are online casinos bad?

How can players be sure they are honest?

I must protect them from themselves.

People should be protected from scammers with fake (always lose) casinos.

[–] sudneo@lemm.ee 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

How can players be sure they are honest?

At the bottom of each gambling sites usually there are the banners for the license(s) the company holds. Complying with licenses (e.g., Maltese) ensures that the due paperwork (i.e., proving that Casino games are functioning according to their certification) is taken care of. So yes, national gambling authorities usually are the ones who protect people from scammers.

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

"functioning according to their certification" doesn't prove to me that they aren't shaving the odds or injecting sneaky code into the process. I have to trust in the technical ability of the regulators.

Also, I could write "regulated by the Maltese" on the bottom of any website, it doesn't make it true.

[–] sudneo@lemm.ee 1 points 7 months ago

They can't add sneaky code to the process (without getting caught). For sensitive game code every single change needs to be tracked and reviewed by the authority. You get audited at least once a year, and then all the changes are reviewed. Authorities outsource the job for the technical reviews to specialized companies.

Also, what's the point? The games already provide a margin to the host, why risking to go out of business for such an irrelevant gain (a few more %)? Add to this that usually casino games writers do just that, write games and sell those to N casinos. So the incentive for the casino games writers are even smaller.

Finally, yes you can write "license X", but you can cross-check that information from the regulator itself, you don't need to trust just the line on the site. The point is you as a customer can choose a trustworthy site, ideally one who is licensed in countries where regulations are quite tight (in Europe I would say Denmark), before putting your money somewhere.

At some point you need to trust "someone", that's how the whole world works. The gambling authorities are no different than the authorities that enforce the safety certifications for electrict equipment, or cars, or whatever.

If your concern is that you would lose money on casino games because the site rigged it, it's a relatively silly concern. You will lose because the casino games are designed to make you lose in the long term, on average.