this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2024
741 points (96.3% liked)

NonCredibleDefense

6434 readers
642 users here now

A community for your defence shitposting needs

Rules

1. Be niceDo not make personal attacks against each other, call for violence against anyone, or intentionally antagonize people in the comment sections.

2. Explain incorrect defense articles and takes

If you want to post a non-credible take, it must be from a "credible" source (news article, politician, or military leader) and must have a comment laying out exactly why it's non-credible. Random twitter and YouTube comments belong in the Low Hanging Fruit thread.

3. Content must be relevant

Posts must be about military hardware or international security/defense. This is not the page to fawn over Youtube personalities, simp over political leaders, or discuss other areas of international policy.

4. No racism / hatespeech

No slurs. No advocating for the killing of people or insulting them based on physical, religious, or ideological traits.

5. No politics

We don't care if you're Republican, Democrat, Socialist, Stalinist, Baathist, or some other hot mess. Leave it at the door. This applies to comments as well.

6. No seriousposting

We don't want your uncut war footage, fundraisers, credible news articles, or other such things. The world is already serious enough as it is.

7. No classified material

Classified information is off limits regardless of how "open source" and "easy to find" it is.

8. Source artwork

If you use somebody's art in your post or as your post, the OP must provide a direct link to the art's source in the comment section, or a good reason why this was not possible (such as the artist deleting their account). The source should be a place that the artist themselves uploaded the art. A booru is not a source. A watermark is not a source.

9. No low-effort posts

No egregiously low effort posts. These include Social media screenshots with a title punchline / no punchline, recent (after the start of the Ukraine War) reposts, simple reaction & template memes, and images with the punchline in the title. Put these in weekly Low effort thread instead.

10. Don't get us banned

No brigading or harassing other communities. Do not post memes with a "haha people that I hate died… haha" punchline or violating the sh.itjust.works rules (below). This includes content illegal in Canada.


Join our Matrix chatroom


Other communities you may be interested in


Banner made by u/Fertility18

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 107 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

Russia's WMD can reach North America, that's why.

[–] skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de 59 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

there's a difference between WMDs that work and rube goldberg war crime machines. why do you think all serious militaries ditched chemical weapons and go balls deep into PGMs? hint: it's not for humanitarian reasons

[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 43 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

True, but let's not pretend that we actually found any substantial WMDs. We found 34 tons of mustard gas. At the time, the US had the most VX gas in the world.

[–] isolatedscotch@discuss.tchncs.de 12 points 2 weeks ago

every time VX gets mentioned i inevitably end up in a Wikipedia rabbit hole, it's now been one and a half hours

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 5 points 2 weeks ago

It's a collector's item!

[–] Icalasari@fedia.io 21 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

And in theory they have enough working ones that at least one is guaranteed to slip through defenses

[–] datelmd5sum@lemmy.world 14 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

If you assume all Russian subs and planes can be sunk / shot down before they release their payloads, there's still over 3000 land based ICBM warheads. There is no terminal phase missile defense system. Majority of the land based warheads will reach terminal phase. The extrapolation that the events in Ukraine mean that nuclear exchange between the two biggest nuclear nations is somehow survivable is both dumb and dangerous.

[–] Transporter_Room_3@startrek.website 16 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Well... The species will probably survive, as will a plethora of other species on the planet.

The things that definitely won't survive are modern society and it's status quo.

Nobody wants a nuclear war. I think we can all agree that it would be bad for an uncountable number of reasons.

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 11 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Nobody wants a nuclear war.

Just a small one perhaps?

[–] Transporter_Room_3@startrek.website 10 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Okay you and Nuke can have a small one, as a treat.

Go play out back, have fun.

[–] verity_kindle@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

They were in their Church Clothes! How could you let them go out in the mud?!

[–] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 weeks ago

Eh, it will vaporise.

[–] nuke@sh.itjust.works 10 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Nobody wants a nuclear war

👀

[–] hydroptic@sopuli.xyz 8 points 3 weeks ago

Ma'am this is a Wendy's

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 3 weeks ago

And also is real, and numerous.