this post was submitted on 21 Aug 2024
7 points (66.7% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5185 readers
356 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 9 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

NYT doing its thing again. From the party platform:

To reach net-zero emissions as rapidly as possible, Democrats commit to eliminating carbon pollution from power plants by 2035 through technology-neutral standards for clean energy and energy efficiency. We will dramatically expand solar and wind energy deployment through community-based and utility-scale systems, including in rural areas. Within five years, we will install 500 million solar panels, including eight million solar roofs and community solar energy systems, and 60,000 wind turbines

I mean there’s more. Not all of it is as specific or aggressive as that, but some is. As they usually do as pertains to US political coverage the NYT is pretty much just making stuff up in this story.

[–] kalkulat@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

I think NYT is correct in this sense: I haven't heard Harris herself say much about 'climate change' let alone 'global warming'.

We all get that. Candidates tend to stay away from talking about stuff that makes people feel bad because it sticks to them. But I've not heard her even address expanding renewables as rapidly as possible, or even heat pumps. No doubt that's the advice she's getting. One reason is that the cars we're driving are a major source of CO2. Nobody's touching that elephant.

[–] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 1 points 2 months ago

“Vice President Harris has yet to detail her own plan” is literally a lie. I linked to her plan.