Agreed. Plus I know my views pay slightly more to creators than ad-supported views (and far more than ad-block views) so I can feel superior to my fellow man.

[–] nexussapphire@lemm.ee 7 points 3 weeks ago

I think it's worth it too. People are just weird about paying for a product that supports individuals creative ambitions just because a company takes a cut. Admittedly better content than streaming services most the time anyway.

[–] can@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

You could use an ad blocker and give even more to the creators you like via Patreon (or ideally better means).

[–] TheRealKuni@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

¿Por qué no los dos?

[–] selokichtli@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 weeks ago

Porque YouTube/Google gana mucho más que el dueño del canal por esa transacción, además de que lo hace explotando a cientos de miles o millones de personas en el mundo que quieren vivir de influencers.

[–] glitches_brew@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

I typically put children's music on YouTube when driving with my kid. Not having to shuffle with the phone to skip ads while in the car is a life saver.