153
Apple is working to make iPhone 16 battery removal easier to comply with EU regulations
(www.techspot.com)
this post was submitted on 29 Jun 2024
153 points (98.7% liked)
Europe
1150 readers
465 users here now
News, interesting stories, and beautiful pictures from Europe 🇪🇺
Spiritual successor to !europe@feddit.de.
(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain)
Feel free to post submissions for banner pictures.
Rules
(This list is obviously incomplete, but it will get expanded when necessary)
- Be nice to each other. (E.g., no direct insults against each other.)
- No bigotry, racism, antisemitism, dehumanisation of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism.
- No links to mis-information.
Also check out !yurop@lemm.ee
founded 1 month ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Why would it be risky? I'm genuinely curious if you have any resources (other than Apple's, because they're obviously biased) that show that a third party battery is dangerous.
As far as I know, as long as the battery meets the dimensions, nominal volatage, chemistry/max charge rate/communication to the charging circuitry, discharge rate, it will function safely.
A battery is a battery is a battery. There's no concievable reason I can think of that would require you use an Apple branded battery. If you have evidence to the contrary I'd love to see it. Knowing proper battery safety is important if you mess with them in any capacity (which I do), so something I may not be aware of is important to know.
I mean a risky investment. Third-party batteries aren’t necessarily a safety risk. They could be, but more commonly they fail to have the same capacity or meet the same cycle count before failure as OEM, when created to match a proprietary form factor.
You must be too young to remember the Galaxy Note 7 fiasco.
The layers of the battery were too close together, and with the right amount of squeezing they touched, causing a LiPo fire.