Asklemmy

43336 readers

790 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

382

My wife, newly hired, was asked to un-blur her camera during a routine meeting to confirm her I9 information. This seems like a violation to me? (lemmy.world)

submitted 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) by shalafi@lemmy.world to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

124 comments fedilink hide all child comments

She had interviewed and met both remotely and in person, this guy was merely an HR drone confirming her documentation. I was a little bent when she told me he had asked her to remove her blur filter "to have a look at her working environment, make sure it's not cluttered" (something along those lines). No one else at this company requested such. Was he way out of line?

I should note, this is my PC in our living room and not where she will be working from. And this guy wants a look around our home?! Told my wife to bring this up once she's settled in, ask HR if this is policy. She started today!

She thinks it's a racism thing. I'm not so sure, but I don't have any other explanation.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] invertedspear@lemm.ee 27 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

I’m not sure what was going on, but a clear background can tell you a lot about a person. I’ve had a few interviewees that applied for US work with no sponsorship turn out to be not already in the US. Pretty sure they were trying to fake it long enough to get us to agree to sponsorship, or overlook the fact they weren’t in the US. The interviewees were both caught because of details in the background during the interview process. Weather and time of day outside the windows not matching where they claimed to live was one, the other was architecture that would be very atypical in a US home.

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 13 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Excuse me sir. I can’t help but notice the Eiffel Tower out your window. Are you sure you’re calling from the US?

[–] filcuk@lemmy.zip 16 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Reporting from Las Vegas, babyyy
*spins a roulette *

[–] Roopappy@lemmy.ml 11 points 3 weeks ago

People are downvoting you, but you're correct. I don't work a particularly sensitive or interesting tech job, but we've had 2 candidates in the last year who were faking who/where they were. One had other people in the room feeding them answers. I'd expect weirdness in remote interviews as companies figure out how to navigate this.

[–] buzz86us@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I guess they'll have to get a shipping container office

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 7 points 3 weeks ago

Based on the condensation on that wall back there, I’m guessing he’s in the Port of Los Angeles right now sir.

Sorry I’m just cracking up at the idea of sensitive state secret-involving location-based jobs using people’s work surroundings as the criterion for confirming they’re not a foreign actor.

Like if that’s the level of security we’re putting on our state secrete we are fucked.