this post was submitted on 16 Aug 2024
482 points (99.6% liked)

NonCredibleDefense

6453 readers
1245 users here now

A community for your defence shitposting needs

Rules

1. Be niceDo not make personal attacks against each other, call for violence against anyone, or intentionally antagonize people in the comment sections.

2. Explain incorrect defense articles and takes

If you want to post a non-credible take, it must be from a "credible" source (news article, politician, or military leader) and must have a comment laying out exactly why it's non-credible. Random twitter and YouTube comments belong in the Low Hanging Fruit thread.

3. Content must be relevant

Posts must be about military hardware or international security/defense. This is not the page to fawn over Youtube personalities, simp over political leaders, or discuss other areas of international policy.

4. No racism / hatespeech

No slurs. No advocating for the killing of people or insulting them based on physical, religious, or ideological traits.

5. No politics

We don't care if you're Republican, Democrat, Socialist, Stalinist, Baathist, or some other hot mess. Leave it at the door. This applies to comments as well.

6. No seriousposting

We don't want your uncut war footage, fundraisers, credible news articles, or other such things. The world is already serious enough as it is.

7. No classified material

Classified information is off limits regardless of how "open source" and "easy to find" it is.

8. Source artwork

If you use somebody's art in your post or as your post, the OP must provide a direct link to the art's source in the comment section, or a good reason why this was not possible (such as the artist deleting their account). The source should be a place that the artist themselves uploaded the art. A booru is not a source. A watermark is not a source.

9. No low-effort posts

No egregiously low effort posts. These include Social media screenshots with a title punchline / no punchline, recent (after the start of the Ukraine War) reposts, simple reaction & template memes, and images with the punchline in the title. Put these in weekly Low effort thread instead.

10. Don't get us banned

No brigading or harassing other communities. Do not post memes with a "haha people that I hate died… haha" punchline or violating the sh.itjust.works rules (below). This includes content illegal in Canada.


Join our Matrix chatroom


Other communities you may be interested in


Banner made by u/Fertility18

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] InFerNo@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 month ago (2 children)

The mileage of diesel is much larger compared to gasoline, with the distances in the US, why is it not popular there?

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

From the little I know, the US considers it more polluting because of whatever unique emission profile. Europe thinks the better mileage more than negates that and in fact makes it better. After VW dieselgate, I think the US's view is considered correct. Not sure where it stands now with diesel exhaust fluid.

Also iirc from what I'm told, Diesel had a bad reputation after poor engines in the 60s, 70s or so. So on a personal level it wasn't popular in the 80s, 90s, etc. Car makers responded and didn't use them in cars - now it's pretty much only VW for diesel cars. Engines are better now but the trend carried even if the reason is forgotten. Big rigs and big ass trucks to haul RVs require it. You pretty much only see them when you require the torque.

[–] Akasazh@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Lol funny that there's a circumstances where polluting is an actual argument held over big oil

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago

Also gasoline was already being adopted as an idustrial standard by the time Rudolf Diesel invented his engine.

[–] Zwiebel 6 points 1 month ago

Because the oil industry doesn't need more diesel customers