this post was submitted on 16 Aug 2024
210 points (98.2% liked)

politics

18828 readers
4644 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Trump has previously sparked criticism for swipes at servicemembers.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] eestileib@sh.itjust.works 10 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

Because like you said the military is ruby red.

People see the R, they pull the lever.

Literally nothing DJT does will cost him votes from people for whom being a Republican is an identity.

It's all about turning out people who prefer left policies but don't vote.

[–] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 13 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

Literally nothing DJT does will cost him votes from people for whom being a Republican is an identity.

I have to disagree a bit here. We're seeing that even that statement has its limits.

We have more and more formerly staunch Trump supporters who are starting to say "Hol' up".

And a lot of people don't have trouble with the mudslinging Trump dishes out, until it hits them personally. Once they become (or feel they've become) a target of the Trump Hate Machine, they tend to change their tune on him pretty quick. I'm not hailing people who do that as heroes, mind you; they were perfectly OK with the hatred until it was directed at them.

I cannot speak and do not speak for those who have served, as I never have. But from everything I've learned from the people who I do know that have served, they value their military service and their brotherhood more than their political identity, and they would take unprovoked attacks on their service (or the service of their fallen brothers) like the comments Trump gave last night about as well as showing up in the middle of Harlem and shouting the N-word through a megaphone. I haven't talked to anybody I know who's served since Trump made those comments, but I don't even think the Trump-friendly ones would be willing to vote for him after that. Again, everybody has their limits.

[–] eestileib@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Yeah people say "hold up", then a week later they're endorsing him again.

McCarthy, McConnell, Graham, Cruz, Vance, it goes on and on.

[–] Okokimup@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

We should always draw a distinction between republican politicians and republican voters. The former are concerned only with their careers and are often not true believers in conservative rhetoric.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)