Technology

59099 readers

3192 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

1141

ISP to Supreme Court: We shouldn’t have to disconnect users accused of piracy (arstechnica.com)

submitted 2 months ago by flop_leash_973@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

156 comments fedilink hide all child comments

It feels dirty to agree with an ISP on something. But even the worst corporations are on the right side of something from time to time I suppose.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] snooggums@midwest.social 78 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Which is absolutely ridiculous since you are paying for the water that you are sharing.

[–] the_post_of_tom_joad@sh.itjust.works 30 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

I know you know this but it bears saying explicitly: it's because pretty much all laws are out there to enforce property first. Humanity is secondary. We all know implicitly that it's not illegal to share your water because it's unethical. It is illegal because making it illegal protects the water company's profits, humanity be damned.

[–] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 2 months ago (1 children)

We all know implicitly that it’s not illegal to share your water because it’s unethical. It is illegal because making it illegal protects the water company’s profits, humanity be damned.

it's perfectly ethical, unless i'm stealing the water, they're using the same water i'm using and that means i'm paying for it. It's literally not a problem.

It might cut flat charges but, get fucked.

[–] feannag@sh.itjust.works 17 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I think you misinterpreted, because you two are saying the same thing. It is ethical to share. Therefore, it has not been made illegal for being unethical (because it is ethical), it has been made illegal to protect profits.

[–] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

oh i think the phrasing just confused me lmao

[–] snooggums@midwest.social 4 points 2 months ago

For sure. Even when it isn't a law the same outcome happens when corporations get the police to enforce their policies.

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

How though? If you're using extra water to share with your neighbor, and YOU still pay your water bill, they still get extra money for extra usage, right? It just comes from your wallet rather than your neighbors.

[–] the_post_of_tom_joad@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Because your sharing your water with them disincentivizes their paying their bill.

Extrapolating on this, if you could legally share your water with the neighborhood couldn't an enterprising person with a zeriscaped yard sell their water to a thirsty lawned neighbor? That's money the water company considers theirs