this post was submitted on 25 May 2024
7 points (100.0% liked)

interestingasfuck

1282 readers
1 users here now

Please go to !interestingshare@lemmy.zip

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Duke_Nukem_1990@feddit.de 0 points 5 months ago (11 children)

Another lie of capitalism. Species don't have inherent value, individuals of a species do. Which is why bad treatment of those individuals can't be justified by appealing to the species' survival. It's about money, like everywhere else.

[–] wahming@monyet.cc 1 points 5 months ago (10 children)

... What. I don't even know where to start with that. Ecological conservation is about money?

[–] Duke_Nukem_1990@feddit.de 0 points 5 months ago (9 children)
[–] wahming@monyet.cc 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Zoos are about money, yes. That's not the point under discussion. I'm taking issue with the line 'species don't have inherent value'. You're basically saying it's ok to drive species extinct as long as its done humanely.

[–] Duke_Nukem_1990@feddit.de 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

ou're basically saying it's ok to drive species extinct

You should read my comment again. This is not what I am saying.

[–] wahming@monyet.cc 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

That's certainly how it comes across when you claim species don't have inherent value. Why would we bother to preserve and protect something that's valueless? You may have meant something else, but judging by the downvotes nobody else is getting your intended meaning either.

[–] Duke_Nukem_1990@feddit.de 0 points 5 months ago

I can't control what people want to interpret into what I write 🤷

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)