Green Energy

2178 readers

106 users here now

everything about energy production

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

poVoq@slrpnk.net

SteveKLord@slrpnk.net

Breakthrough barium titanate solar panels are 1000x more powerful than existing panels (www.thebrighterside.news)

submitted 2 months ago by SteveKLord@slrpnk.net to c/energy@slrpnk.net

30 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Researchers at Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg (MLU) have discovered a new method to increase the efficiency of solar cells by a factor of 1,000. The team of scientists achieved this breakthrough by creating crystalline layers of barium titanate, strontium titanate, and calcium titanate, which were alternately placed on top of one another in a lattice structure.

Their findings, which could revolutionize the solar energy industry, were recently published in the journal Science Advances.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] fr0g@piefed.social 47 points 2 months ago (6 children)

The headline seems to be a but misleading though. Seems like it's 1000x more efficient than pure barium titanate would be.
Also seems like it has the potential to be much ore efficient than conventional silicon based panels, but not by a factor of 1000.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 34 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Current solar panels are about 25% efficient, so 1000 times that would be 25.000%. I think Mr. Boltzmann and Mr. Maxwell might have some objections here.

[–] Monument@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 2 months ago

In this house we obey the laws of thermodynamics!

[–] Liz@midwest.social 5 points 2 months ago

Now that's what I call efficient!

[–] SteveKLord@slrpnk.net 10 points 2 months ago

Thanks for clarifying that. That publication can be prone to clickbait style headlines it seems but they also publish some good information overall and I thought it was worth noting

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 6 points 2 months ago

Indeed, this seems impossible. Current solar panels are surprisingly efficient as it stands.

[–] ZeroGravitas@lemm.ee 6 points 2 months ago

Thanks for the reality check. Still a huge result if it translates well into mass production.

[–] RecluseRamble@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 months ago (2 children)

It says in the article

compared to pure barium titanate of a similar thickness, the current flow was up to 1,000 times stronger

And in the referenced paper

In addition, the photoresponse from SBC222 is 1000 times higher than that from BTO

Neither sound like a measure of efficiency to me. But I'm also no expert and the paper went well beyond my head.

[–] Tiresia@slrpnk.net 3 points 2 months ago

"Strong current flow" is informal language, but both it and photoresponse refer to the electrical power that comes out. In theory you would just divide that by the incoming solar flux and get the efficiency. For now it's only in a lab setting, though, so we'll have to see what the practical efficiency will be if this is actually incorporated into a reasonable solar cell.

So yeah, apparently barium titanate solar panels used to be extremely terrible, and now they might become competitive with further research.

[–] Malgas@beehaw.org 1 points 2 months ago

It's not a measure of efficiency per se, but efficiency is a limiting factor:

In order for a solar panel to put out 1000x more power, the baseline you're comparing it to must be at most 0.1% efficient, because otherwise the new thing would have greater than 100% efficiency and that isn't possible.

And that's a purely thermodynamic argument. The actual limit for solar efficiency is likely less.

[–] finley@lemm.ee 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Even a few hundred percent improvement would be great.

[–] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago

If it's over 400%-500%, it's fake news, because that'd be generating more energy than is emitted by the sun (per area at distance).