this post was submitted on 11 Aug 2024
394 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37585 readers
337 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

uBlock Origin will soon stop functioning in Chrome as Google transitions to new browser extension rules.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FlashMobOfOne@beehaw.org 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

They are now.

That's what I don't get with the Anti-Brave crowd. Brave learns their users don't like a feature and then they do better. This would, to me, be indicative of the way things should proceed.

Meanwhile Firefox is moving backwards.

By all means, use a browser that doesn't work as well, but maybe don't run a circle jerk of trolls whenever someone offers a better-working alternative.

[–] princessnorah@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 month ago

Personally, I think I should be able to expect a company to understand their target demographic well enough to know that those "features" wouldn't be well received. But I also personally don't consider ads and crypto garbage to be features. I guess if you do, then it's the perfect browser for you. However, I don't really want to contribute to Google's monopolisation of browser engine development anymore. Nor do I want to use a browser developed by a homophobe. So even if Brave may be slightly "better-working" I would not consider it better at all.

As well, even though I'm a Blahaj member, I'm going to take the time to point out the "Bee Nice" rule of the instance we're currently on. It feels like you're skirting dangerously close to violating that, considering you implied I'm a troll for calling out the prejudicial politics of the founder of a piece of software, which you didn't at all address in your comment. I'm going to attach some resources about it here, if you care to read them at all:

  1. https://www.pinknews.co.uk/2012/04/04/javascript-inventor-gave-1000-to-support-californias-gay-marriage-ban/
  2. https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2014/03/gay-firefox-developers-boycott-mozilla-to-protest-ceo-hire/
  3. https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2014/03/mozilla-employees-to-brendan-eich-step-down/
  4. https://tim.dreamwidth.org/1844711.html
  5. https://modelviewculture.com/pieces/killing-the-messenger-at-mozilla
  6. https://tim.dreamwidth.org/1852118.html
  7. https://community.brave.com/t/brave-needs-to-address-brendan-eich/281044

(Some of these are older, about the push for him to step down as Mozilla CEO, some are newer and urging him to leave Brave, or for people to boycott it.)