this post was submitted on 08 Aug 2024
317 points (82.3% liked)

Memes

45738 readers
556 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
gary_host_laptop@lemmy.ml
sexy_peach@feddit.de
cyclohexane@lemmy.ml
cypherpunks@lemmy.ml
317
laughing ass off at hacks (lemmy.world)
submitted 3 months ago by no_nothing@lemmy.world to c/memes@lemmy.ml
94 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

That would also make a corporate exec meddling with the production to meet their expectations as artists...

[โ€“] PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 months ago

Yup. That's why I'm skeptical of directors are artists.

Or, more accurately, I don't think you can get a clear black and white answer about if someone is an artist or something is art.
It's probably more like a grey area, a sliding scale.

I think we're looking at this question wrong anyways. Anything can be art, this is just a tool and in the hands of an artist it will contribute to the creation of art.
The question is: is this a net benefit for society? Is it helping new/hidden artists create art that they otherwise couldn't? Or is it making the life of the artist harder by fucking up the job market? Both?