this post was submitted on 08 Aug 2024
1298 points (96.2% liked)

memes

10368 readers
2532 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] IndiBrony@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago (7 children)

Others will present themselves. Mozilla have been on a downtrend for years. I've heard of a couple of alternatives, but I don't have the experience with any of them. If anyone knows any good Firefox alternatives, please let us know!

[–] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 65 points 3 months ago (3 children)

If by that you mean “some alt-right-adjacent bro will come up with a new browser that’s essentially reskinned Chromium with a crypto wallet duct-taped to it”, you’re probably right

[–] AVincentInSpace@pawb.social 3 points 3 months ago

It's okay you can just say Brave

[–] glitchdx@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

those already exist

[–] RandomVideos@programming.dev 2 points 3 months ago

Isnt that brave?

[–] Katana314@lemmy.world 21 points 3 months ago

This used to be the thought, but the trouble is, HTML is now such a vastly complex web of requirements, mixed with the unwritten rules set by Chrome, it’s doubtful another browser could push forward easily; especially without a major source of funding.

[–] PotatoesFall@discuss.tchncs.de 13 points 3 months ago (1 children)

All good modern browsers are based either on firefox or chromium if I'm not terribly misinformed

[–] chris@l.roofo.cc 9 points 3 months ago (2 children)
[–] grue@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Webkit is Chromium (or at least, Chromium is Webkit, since the inheritance goes in the other direction).

The only ^1^ browser engine that is a completely separate and independent codebase from Chrome is Firefox's.

(^1^ aside from extremely niche/unusable stuff like Lynx)

[–] stinerman@midwest.social 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Close. Chromium uses Blink which was originally a fork of WebKit. I have no idea how much they've diverged since then.

[–] ivn@jlai.lu 2 points 3 months ago

The fork was 11 years ago, so a lot. So much that they are considered different engines now.

[–] PotatoesFall@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 3 months ago

fair enough, although I'm not sure that falls in the "good" category :P

[–] yamanii@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

Forks are often dependent on the original unless the source just gave up.

[–] TotallyNotSpezUpload@startrek.website 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Vivaldi is my favourite browser, made by decent people.

[–] Voyajer@lemmy.world 15 points 3 months ago
[–] BarbecueCowboy@lemmy.world -4 points 3 months ago (2 children)
[–] ricecake@sh.itjust.works 39 points 3 months ago (2 children)

And also based on chrome. That's the thing that people seem to keep ignoring. Your browser options are Firefox or something based on chrome.

[–] pelerinli@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

pre-chromium Edge was too good to be true.

[–] OfficerBribe@lemm.ee 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

It was shit. Once Edge changed to Chromium it actually became a viable option and in my opinion made Chrome irrelevant in business environment.

Chromium browsers are good. I personally prefer Firefox, but Chromium is alright.

[–] BarbecueCowboy@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

No one asked for something that wasn't Chromium based here. It's the open source community, that's how it works, most of us are very happy to settle for just having some different maintainers. We weren't ignoring it, it's just not relevant in this particular post.

[–] ricecake@sh.itjust.works -1 points 3 months ago

Well, given the people talking about it I'm not sure I'd agree that no one was asking or talking about finding something not chromium based.

A lot of people don't like having a monoculture, Google driving the entire cadence for new feature development for the web, or having a privacy focused browser whose process is to try to delete the tracking from a not privacy focused browser.

[–] IndiBrony@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I suppose for me personally the question will always be: how good is it with adblocks? Especially on youtube as that's where I spend a lot of my time. SponsorBlock on Firefox has been invaluable for me, not just blocking ads, but auto-skipping the whole "like, comment subscribe" and in-video ads etc.

[–] BarbecueCowboy@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

It has Adblock Plus built in which is not the best, but still pretty alright. You can still install most regular chrome extensions though and should be able to get mostly the same experience you have now.

[–] Zeta616@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Built in ad block is decent, you can add extra filter lists the same way you can with ublock origin

That said, just install ublock origin and sponsorblock as an extension from the chrome store