this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2024
228 points (97.1% liked)

World News

38506 readers
2727 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] LustyArgonianMana@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago (14 children)

People are freaked about WW3 breaking out

[–] CaptainSpaceman@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago (12 children)

Usually war is a way to stop a recession/depression since its so profitable.

The economy has been fucked far longer than the current conflicts that might actually start ww3

[–] Gsus4@mander.xyz 12 points 1 month ago (8 children)

It is only profitable for a few in some places. War is not net good for "business"

[–] Coreidan@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

In a stagflation scenario war is great for business. Otherwise you have no business at all.

[–] Gsus4@mander.xyz 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Isn't WW2 the only example of this in practice? (and then only where the war did not reach, like the US or pre-1940 nazi germany)

[–] Coreidan@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Ya it’s a pretty good example since WW2 was a stagflation scenario. It’s exactly the same scenario we are headed into. There’s a lot of similar polarities. Some may even argue that the next world war will break out precisely because of stagflation.

As we descend further and further into economic depression (we’ve been in a recession for years) you’ll see the gears of war begin to spool up.

[–] Gsus4@mander.xyz 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

One would think we'd have learned to fix this inevitability by now...or is it intentional, to "fix the stagflation"?

[–] CaptainSpaceman@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

The economy squeezes the proles for every penny they have, inflating the money faster than wages to ensure only the rich can afford to maintain.

Once the proles have been squeezed dry, have a major conflict and help save the failing banks and restore a "golden era" for a time.

Then do it all over again by starting to squeeze the masses.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 2 points 1 month ago

Part of the problem is getting everyone on board. Economic prosperity is a great way to justify keeping a government in charge. Major economic downturns usually cause a change of government and unrest with the government in general. Without a good economy as justification to keep a government in power, many governments turn to "defense" as a reason to stay in power.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)