this post was submitted on 04 Aug 2024
675 points (94.3% liked)

Memes

1202 readers
277 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] timbuck2themoon@sh.itjust.works 0 points 3 months ago (3 children)

If he was that popular and progressives that numerous he wouldn't have lost his primary, especially as the incumbent. Simple as.

[–] DancingBear@midwest.social 4 points 3 months ago (2 children)

You are clueless as far as actual policies supported by actual Americans. Policy wise, there is pretty much a super majority of Americans that support actual progressive policies

[–] timbuck2themoon@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 months ago (2 children)

If that was the case then maybe they should get off their asses and vote then huh?

[–] Wes4Humanity@lemm.ee -1 points 3 months ago

As soon as there's a candidate that actually represents them... Imagine if the 2 candidates were Trump and Romney, both running as Republicans... Would libs be crying that everyone needs to vote Republican or the Republicans will win? Replace Republican with conservative in that last sentence, and maybe it will clear up why progressives don't bother voting... There is no one to vote for

(I'm voting for Kamala, so should everyone)

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Policy wise, there is pretty much a super majority of Americans that support actual progressive policies

There's a huge trust gap in implementation. That's why Donald Trump threaten a national victory via votes from dying Boomers convinced he's going to unleash fantasy free health care technology while Bernie Sanders can't squeak through a primary on the promise of increasing Medicaid enrollments.

People may want the same things, but they are deeply cynical in who they trust to deliver those policies.

[–] DancingBear@midwest.social 2 points 3 months ago

Health care is a fantasy in the United States don’t get sick here it would be cheaper to fly to a hotel in Paris if you are sick I suppose

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

If he was that popular and progressives that numerous he wouldn’t have lost his primary

Propaganda works. You can bombard people with media attacks on a progressive politician to trick people into thinking he's reactionary. In this case, a heavily Jewish district was flooded with "Jamaal Bowman is antisemetic" messaging for months straight and it cost him the election.

This has nothing to do with his popularity or his progressive bonafides and everything to do with his cash on hand to run counter-programming.

[–] timbuck2themoon@sh.itjust.works 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Again, he was down a ton before the AIPAC money came in.

That PAC bullshit is just that but it doesn't explain his loss.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

he was down a ton before the AIPAC money came in

George Latimer was recruited and sponsored by AIPAC on day one.

[–] cheeseandrice@lemm.ee 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

That you’re being downvoted for this totally reasonable comment only inches away from a top level comment lamenting a system that silences dissenting views is nice.

[–] archomrade@midwest.social 2 points 3 months ago

Lol because he's citing the system being critiqued as evidence to make the case that progressive politics aren't popular

"This system disadvantages dissenting views"

"Dissenting views just arent popular, just look at the outcome of this system"