this post was submitted on 04 Aug 2024
86 points (93.9% liked)

Games

16369 readers
784 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works
86
Larian nearly made Baldur's Gate 4, it was partially playable and 'something that you all would have liked', but the studio didn't want to spend another 3 years on it (www.pcgamer.com)
submitted 1 month ago by nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works to c/games@sh.itjust.works
9 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] BananaTrifleViolin@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I suspect the other big consideration is the IP. When they made BG3, the IP had lain dormant for years and D&D wasn't a priority for Hasbro.

Larian made a hugely successful game and Hasbro sat up and has started talking about how its going to push forward with the IP. The terms for BG4 are probably not as favourable for Larian (maybe they weren't great for BG3). That may be worse revenue split and may also be much more direction and involvement of the IP holder restricting creativity.

Why would Larian expend all that creative effort again on someone else's IP? They can chose what they do next and it will get attention as they are the studio behind the biggest game of 2023. Probably makes sense from the studios perspective not to do BG3, and go back to developing their own IP. And the industry is littered with failed studios screwed over by big publishers or IP holders - I think Larian are very sensible to move on.

[โ€“] MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I for one am ready for some more Divinity, if they go that route.

They kind of did the same thing, briefly exploring the idea of continuing with a sequel to Original Sin 2, before they started development of BG3.

But something new would work for me, too.