this post was submitted on 03 Aug 2024
1148 points (100.0% liked)

196

16542 readers
2058 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CleoTheWizard@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

While it’s definitely true they could’ve intercepted comms, I don’t know that they did do that. And telescopes would only get them to confirming things up to orbit probably.

I still think it’s likely they knew it was real, I’ve just never been able to confirm that they did for myself and so the argument I’m using it much weaker without that piece of evidence. Not to mention that Russia has had state actors promoting the conspiracy theory in recent years which makes things confusing

[–] alekwithak@lemmy.world 20 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Well it's certainly not proof per se*, but considering all the bugs and spies the USSR planted it seems like a no brainer that they would be listening in on any and all unencrypted over the air communications.

[–] abfarid@startrek.website 15 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Just FYI, the phrase is "per se", not "per say". It's Latin for "by itself".

[–] alekwithak@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Just FYI, Not according to my android keyboard's autocorrect.

[–] abfarid@startrek.website 4 points 3 months ago

Maybe it has learned from previous occasions. Mine doesn't suggest either option.