this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2024
27 points (82.9% liked)

History

4196 readers
1 users here now

Welcome to History!

This community is dedicated to sharing and discussing fascinating historical facts from all periods and regions.

Rules:

FOLLOW THE CODE OF CONDUCT

NOTE WELL: Personal attacks and insults will not be tolerated. Stick to talking about the historical topic at hand in your comments. Insults and personal attacks will get you an immediate ban for a period of time determined by the moderator who bans you.

  1. Post about history. Ask a question about the past, share a link to an article about something historical, or talk about something related to history that interests you. Please encourage discussion whenever possible.

  2. No memes. No ads. No promos. No spam.

  3. No porn.

  4. We like facts and reliable sources here. Don't spread misinformation or try to change the historical record.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] m0darn@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 month ago (7 children)

if Germany had proceeded with operation Sealion - invasion of Britain- and succeeded

But they didn't because it wouldn't have worked.

[–] SquiffSquiff@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (6 children)

The battle of Britain was a very close thing and if the Germans had used a slightly different strategy, they could have won. Given that America was not yet in the war and there was an alliance with the Soviet Union, could you explain why the Germans could not have proceeded with operation sealion bearing in mind that the allies did essentially the reverse 4 years later?

[–] Adderbox76@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (4 children)

Germany didn't have the manpower or the economy for a protracted war. Hence the early reliance on "Blitzkreig" when taking France/Poland/etc...

The moment that first push petered out and it became a slog instead of a blitz, they had already lost. It was just a matter of time.

As someone already mentioned, the Nazi state's entire strategy relied on getting access to Russia's oil reserves before their own ran out. They were on a ticking clock until they could make that happen (which ultimately they didn't).

As for operation Sea Lion giving them British Empire oil, why would you think that taking the island of Britain meant that they automatically take all the colonies of Britain? Conquering an island doesn't mean they get Canada and India (for example). That's not how war works.

[–] john89@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago

What was stopping Germany from simply buying oil from Russia?

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)