this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2024
103 points (90.6% liked)

Progressive Politics

999 readers
192 users here now

Welcome to Progressive Politics! A place for news updates and political discussion from a left perspective. Conservatives and centrists are welcome just try and keep it civil :)

(Sidebar still a work in progress post recommendations if you have them such as reading lists)

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

ArtNews.com

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] unmagical@lemmy.ml 94 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Judge Christopher Hehir told Plummer and Holland they “came within the width of a pane of glass of destroying one of the most valuable artworks in the world”

Meanwhile the people they are protesting are already destroying the planet which includes this artwork. And hey, that "pane of glass" is there to protect the artwork which it successfully did.

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 32 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

The judge's statement is so disingenuous, designed to deceive rather than to promote a realistic view of actions and consequences. They didn't throw a can at the painting and luckily the glass held, they splashed some soup, with no chance of piercing the glass and doing no damage to it, and if the pane of glass wasn't there they wouldn't have done it.

Damaging the frame is something he can complain about, but the painting was never in danger. There's definitely some political thrust to these overwrought and deceptive sentences the UK is giving to climate activists.

[–] Pilferjinx@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

Not only is it covered with glass the painting is also coated in a synthetic varnish that can easily be cleaned and replaced without harming the actual paint layer. Prison is too oppressive for something that can be cleaned for less than a grand.