Technology

59099 readers

3201 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

-19

The New Internet (tailscale.com)

submitted 3 months ago by starman@programming.dev to c/technology@lemmy.world

12 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Quik@infosec.pub 4 points 3 months ago (4 children)

Why are there so many downvotes on this?

[–] alleycat@lemmy.world 26 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Because it's an ad.

[+] Quik@infosec.pub -7 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Interesting, that seems to be the reason for most. Under which circumstances if any would you upvote a perceived advertisement?

Would you upvote a well written advertisement that you think makes the company’s intention very clear to the reader? Would you do so if the intention not only sounded realistic, but also like they want to achieve something net-positive?

Or is it really just being an advertisement that makes you downvote?

[–] Womble@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago

Would you upvote a well written advertisement that you think makes the company’s intention very clear to the reader?

No, advertising is a cancer that is destroying the web.

[–] alleycat@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago

I just want it to be disclosed that this is a form of advertisement before I click on the link:

The post should be clearly marked as advertisement in the title, e.g.

[advertisement] Title

And the post should contain a summary or at least an abstract, not just a link.

[–] matto@lemm.ee 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I don't get it either! It's a good article and I 100% agree with the author. Maybe it's because it's talking about a service and the whole article can be considered as advertisement, but I don't agree.

[–] Quik@infosec.pub -1 points 3 months ago

Yeah, I don’t agree with the conclusion (like at all), but I still found the first 3/4 of the article very nicely put and definitely worth reading.

[–] XTL@sopuli.xyz 5 points 3 months ago

Bs title? No content in the post beyond a link?

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 1 points 3 months ago

My guess is there is a lot of text before it gets to the point