this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2023
11 points (100.0% liked)

Fuck Cars

9363 readers
134 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] AdmiralShat@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The issue is that all of those apartments are owned by one person getting filthy fucking rich from rent.

[–] 5714@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Then organise the renters, let them buy the house to transform it into syndicate or cooperative housing. Social apartment construction isn't impossible.

[–] SendMePhotos@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What a fuckin great idea. Immediate downside is who's in charge of the bills?

[–] orrk@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

ask yourself this: if the apartment is owned by a company who is in charge of bills?

in the case witht he syndicate, the syndicate is in charge of the bills, the bills are split up among the members, this stuff all already exists btw.

[–] menemen@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Maybe in the US. In Germany this defintly isn't the rule. Many people own their own flats and a lot of people own 2-4 flats to rent them out as an extra income.

[–] akulium@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

No, maybe you are in a more wealthy environment. It is not possible that everyone has multiple flats to rent out. In fact, Germany has one of the lowest ownership rates.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_home_ownership_rate

[–] menemen@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Where did I say "everyone"?

But it is defintly not a given that an apartment has to be the tool of a slum lord, the way they portrayed it to discredit the idea that appatments are a more sustainable way of living...

Apartments can be owned by the people who live in it and this is quite common in many countries.

[–] akulium@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

If one person rents out 4 appartments, that means that at least 4 others do not own their home. It's the same with houses of course.

Germany is just a particularly bad example unfortunately. Low ownership is a problem because it increases wealth inequality, which is also worse in Germany than many other nations.