this post was submitted on 28 Jul 2024
239 points (98.4% liked)

Fairvote Canada

180 readers
1 users here now

What is This Group is About?/De Quoi Parle ce Groupe?

The unofficial Lemmy movement to bring proportional representation to all levels of government in Canada.

Voters deserve more choice and accountability from all politicians.

Le mouvement non officiel de Lemmy visant à amener la représentation proportionnelle à tous les niveaux de gouvernement au Canada.

Les électeurs méritent davantage de choix et de responsabilité de la part de tous les politiciens.


Related Communities/Communautés Associées

Resources/Ressources

Official Organizations/Organisations Officielles


We're looking for more moderators, especially those who are of French and indigenous identities.

Nous recherchons davantage de modérateurs, notamment ceux qui sont d'identité française et autochtone.

founded 5 months ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] natecox@programming.dev 26 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Is Ontario First-Past-the-Post? Because if it is, no surprises there.

Ranked choice now, please.

[–] Beaver@lemmy.ca 11 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I’m down for proportional representation (PR) for voting in elections, with each voter having a single transferable vote (STV).

[–] threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works 12 points 3 months ago (2 children)

There are many voting systems. PR is nice, but almost any of them would be better than FPTP.

[–] SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 months ago

Yeah, honestly it's just a question of whichever is easiest to enstate. They all allow for 3rd parties which is the main thing here – breaking the duopoly on power.

[–] morbidcactus@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Exactly, seriously just give me anything.

Stv works in Australia + Malta and Alberta used it until the 50s, mmpr in New Zealand and Welsh + Scottish parliament. Australia also has instant runoff for the lower chamber so like we don't have to use one form everywhere, use what makes sense. I'm pointing out commonwealth nations as we generally all have some form of Westminster parliament, but there's other examples too, Germany uses mmpr afaik

[–] killingspark 2 points 3 months ago

Germany has a better way of representing the people but it also has its problems. We have a comically big parliament because of the way our system works

Exactly, seriously just give me anything.

Even frickin' random ballot would have advantages over FPTP.

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Yes it is, further our current premier made it illegal for municipalities to use other voting systems because he doesn’t want people to understand them (London was going to use ranked iirc)

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Why would the political leadership change an election system in a way that would hurt their odds of winning reelection?

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

He’s provincial not municipal

The system was going to be for council/mayor and he made it so they don’t have authority to change their own systems