Whilst this is not a local only post/community, it is primarily intended for blahaj lemmy members. Top level replies from non blahaj accounts will be removed.
=======
I want to take the moment to clarify the Blahaj Lemmy position on things, given recent events and the fallout that has followed. This will give people the chance to decide for themselves if blahaj zone lemmy is the right space for them, or if it doesn't meet their needs.
First and foremost, blahaj zone lemmy exists to give a space for queer folk to exist, with their needs explicitly protected as the highest priority, and with a particular focus on the needs of gender diverse folk. Most lemmy instances are not run by trans folk, and whilst many are still inclusive, they don't always prioritise our needs. Others barely consider trans folk, and react only to the most blatant of bigotry.
We are not a political instance, however political communities have a space here, as does any community that is actively protective of the needs of queer and gender diverse folk. Given the impact of politics on gender diverse folk, that means lots of dialogue and strong opinions exist, and as long as those opinions are honestly held, and not bigoted or exclusive, people are welcome to have and express those opinions here.
For what it's worth, I am a member of the Greens Party in Australia. I have no time for the middle ground politics of the Australian Labor party, let alone the right wing beliefs of the Australian Liberal party. Yet a community of queer Labor Party aligned folk would fit on blahaj lemmy, because the parties ideologies, are not explicitly anti queer. A community aligned with the Australian Liberal party likely would not have a place here, unless the goal of the community was to work at actively challenging the anti queer policies of the party.
That being said, political communities (or any other communities) that exist solely to target and take aim at other queer folk have no place here either. The goal of blahaj lemmy is queer inclusion, and a community whose sole goal is division, will be removed.
The downside to this is that as we assume good faith in members and we don't gatekeep or deny access to people because of their pronouns or gender identity, (even when those identities are challenging to many) it is possible for bad faith actors to take advantage of our inclusive policies. Unfortunately, that's just something we are going to have to navigate as it occurs, because I won't let bad faith folk push this instance to defaulting to exclusion or gatekeeping the validity of someone's identity. I will respect a trolls pronouns even as I ban them, because to not do so, normalises the idea that pronouns are something that are earned by good behaviour, or that other people have a say in the validity of another person's identity and pronouns.
So that's where we stand. Hopefully this will help people decide for themselves whether or not this is the right instance for them.
I am a blahaj member. The AusGreens have shown when I was a member that they are not afraid to dance the transphobic tango. AusLabor is pro trans and transphobia is much rarer. Don't pretend like the greens are some knights of Australian Leftists.
The greens inability to deal with their internal TERFs is a huge problem. It's the main reason I'm not terribly active with them despite being a member.
My issues with Labor are bigger than their trans policy though
Yeah unfortunately it seems like TERFs hide well there, as when I attended meetings as a member, there was about 2-3 people wearing TERF/similar shirts and things, and the topic came up once or twice. I reported this, to never get a reply.
No doubt that the Australian Greens have had, and continue to have, issues with transphobia. However, I think it's disingenuous to say they are definitively a transphobic party. For example, Samantha Ratnam, the leader of the Victorian Greens, has been incredibly vocal in her support of trans members, as has Senator Janet Rice, as has federal party leader Adam Bandt.
This is a pretty typical M.O. for TERFs, to specifically target progressive social movements from within and turn them against transgender persons. Are you suggesting that we roll over and give up, and just let the TERFs takeover the party? Like, I'm sorry, but I'm not a single issue voter. I care strongly about things like climate change, drug decriminalisation & harm reduction, reduction of the police force, sex worker rights and healthcare. Victorian Labor are very pro-cop for example, and I try hard to acknowledge my privilege as white by considering how that affects my queer PoC siblings first and foremost.
This comment feels like you're trolling honestly, especially because you say you're a Blahaj member instead of just commenting with your Blahaj account...
I should say, the reason I did not comment using my account was because I was accidentally banned in a wave, which has now been reversed. No need to have a tanty over it. Yeah another thing, I'm Trans and Indigenous, not just some white dude commenting. One more, I'm not rolling over, it's just I have reported the TERFs and been ignored by the greens. And while I am replying, I think that the police need a massive chunk of reform, but we need to stop pretending like cops/rule enforcement isn't somehow necessary. No matter what society, there will always be people who do vile, disgusting and horrible things and unfortunately I live in an area with that happening a lot, so please know I don't live in some rich place with no crime and no reason to have cops. I care a lot about healthcare as someone who has conditions regularly requiring help, aswell as climate change as a young person. I don't think the whole Greens are TERFS, just it has a serious issue with it.