const is more like C++ constexpr, but static is similar to static from C: it's a variable that lives outside any scope. Of course, that means the same static can be accessed by multiple threads, so writing to a static is unsafe (except for types like Mutex, you can safely use those to write, but your static won't be declared mut)
If you made it static, sure, but right now you're living compiler error
Link-local IPv6 address? smh
But it's not literally the Holocaust again, so it's fine /s
I'm trans, god help me...
I can't seem to find this book
const mut...
My kind of communism :3
And as we know, saying nice things one time means everything else you did was good. And certainly you wouldn't lie about those nice things! /s
I wish people were better at critical thinking.
Parts of it seem to be inherently more secure, but there are some pretty glaring holes. At least software distribution is much more secure than the Windows approach.
New GRS procedure??
What's wrong with GMOs? Poor genetic diversity?
A diagram of a "bottom meson" (composed of an unknown quark "q" and an antibottom quark) with an arrow labeled ":3" pointing to a "double bottom Baryon" (composed of an unknown quark "q" and 2 bottom quarks).
Image taken from figure 1 of this article
Two (presumably) girls lying in bed holding hands and looking at each other. The one on the left, labeled "Me" has shoulder-length hair, an uncomfortable :| expression, and is wearing a black hoodie, grey jeans, and sneakers. The one on the right, labeled "Also me" has longer hair, a subtle smile, a blush, and is wearing a dress and high heels.
Edited from this post, on which I commented "I wanna be both".
Half Life 2: Episode 1, Direct Intervention
λ
Yay, infertile!