xor

joined 1 year ago
[–] xor@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 4 days ago

Yeah it's been like 3 years of this plus "but I like when the port is a circle, not an oval!" 😴

[–] xor@lemmy.blahaj.zone -1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

But all of those arguments are still valid, even if you make the assumption that it was all an evil scheme to make you buy some headphones

[–] xor@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Lula Brazil is very different from bolsonaro Brazil

[–] xor@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

From your first source

Figure 1 shows that China had very low inequality levels in the late 1970s, but it is now approaching the US, where income concentration remains the highest among the countries shown

[–] xor@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 2 weeks ago (19 children)

If they're exclusively supporting the right wing candidate, they're not a centrist, then

[–] xor@lemmy.blahaj.zone 19 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Oh they absolutely do, but ml has a reputation for being particularly poorly moderated

[–] xor@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 2 weeks ago (7 children)

Why are you unwilling to enlighten us?

[–] xor@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Let's go look at your comment history and check, shall we?

Defending yourself and launching invasions or orchestrating soldiers are two different things

It's not defending yourself if you have an army! What a great take 👍

it sounds like the government is giving out plans and commanding the army. The government of ukraine and people from ukraine are two different things. When people ask what's the alternative to send billions to the ukrainian government what they need to understand is that people can defend themself even without an authority on top of them playing war games with soldiers and possibly forcing conscript to go on missions

Oh, why did Ukraine never consider magically winning the war by sheer willpower instead of this "having an army" nonsense, smart!

I'm not twisting anything. Context matters, and the context of your post was you throwing a tantrum after around 10 different Lemmy users calling out your bad takes.

If you believe not being drafted blah blah blah

That's not what I said at all, mere moments after you accused me of "twisting" what you said. What I said, louder for the people in the back is BEING UNABLE TO FIGHT BACK IN THE ENEMY'S TERRITORY, BEING DISALLOWED TO RECEIVE FOREIGN AID AND BEING DISALLOWED TO FORM AN ACTUAL ARMY is the equivalent of rolling over and dying.

[–] xor@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 3 weeks ago

This is literally about a judge fining the diplomat half a million, though?? Like isn't this literally the exact opposite of that

[–] xor@lemmy.blahaj.zone 61 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (15 children)

The issue, from what I can tell, is that the question you've asked here doesn't match the argument you just had in comments of a post about about the Ukraine war. The argument you were trying to make is not "war bad", but specifically that Ukraine's counteroffensive is bad. You were additionally arguing that it is morally reprehensible for other countries to provide economic support to Ukraine rather than leaving them to "defend themselves".

There's a few important details that such an argument (intentionally) ignores.

  • This invasion was not a choice between war or no war. It was simply a decision between locations that battles take place. It is entirely legitimate for Ukraine to pursue a counteroffensive strategy into russian territory if it believes it to be a more effective military strategy than defensive attritional warfare within their own borders.
  • The fact that combat is taking place in Russian territory doesn't change the fact that the war itself is a defensive war against an aggressor with overtly territorial/imperialist goals.
  • As far as I am aware, the units involved in the counteroffensive are exclusively non-drafted volunteer units.
  • Cessation of funding to Ukraine would lead to their imminent loss. The fact that they have been able to innovate cheaper strategies like domestic drone usage doesn't change the fact that war is extremely expensive and technology dependent, and their economy is dwarfed by that of Russia's.

The combination of your proposals that Ukraine should not proactively fight back, and that they should lose access to the resources that would allow them to continue to defend their territory end us meaning that Ukraine would not be able to effectively defend itself.

From reading your comments alongside this post, it seems that the title should actually be "how do you make someone understand that rolling over and dying is good", to which the answer is "oh fuck off mate"

view more: next ›