velxundussa

joined 1 year ago
[–] velxundussa@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Rough translation, but here it was "Ordinary Nintendo", as opposed to the Super Nintendo

[–] velxundussa@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago

I do not.

But a quick search online says that Stephen Hawking had an IQ of 160.

[–] velxundussa@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 month ago (3 children)

This feels a lot like pretty people saying that looks don't matter all of a sudden.

I wonder if there's a relation with people saying that what they have is not valuable.

[–] velxundussa@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 months ago

I agree with the sentiment of your post, but I think the examples are a bit too far fetched:

I'd wager most people use a computer/phone on a daily basis, which is why having a basic understanding of it seems like knowledge we should all have.

Inversely, most people don't need even have a turbo in their car and many don't even have a car, so any knowledge relating to that is probably useless for them.

That being said, even if someone is less knowledgeable in a field, respect should always be the baseline, as you illustrate, they're probably skilled in something else!

I'm saying that as an IT person that's aware that I'm making money mostly because people don't bother to learn all this, so in the end I don't mind that much.