It's less stupud to listen to Taylor Swift than it is to Ben Shapiro.
Choose who you listen to wisely. And no, her being a singer has little influence on that decision.
It's less stupud to listen to Taylor Swift than it is to Ben Shapiro.
Choose who you listen to wisely. And no, her being a singer has little influence on that decision.
Well, they are half-eaten on the back, so checks out.
I'd argue anything over 30°C is hot, but yes.
Not everyone believes an AI bubble is forming
Well, the AI's not wrong. No one believes a bubble is forming, since it's already about to burst!
If they have citizenship in any EU member state they can. Otherwise unfortunately no.
It's not about ABS, its about BS like an everything touchscreen, tracking, bullshit subscriptions and the like
Yes. Yes it did.
No, they did not report that in media.
It is about them and their honour.
However, their honour isn't how they're percieved and treated by others, it's how they themselves act. They're the first ones who should show honour and dignity towards their defendants, clerks, etc.
Angry fits like this one just show the judge got corrupted by power and should either be given time to reflect or disbarred.
but not the misuse of public content
Is that an admission that they don't own the content others posted on their site?
He'll superpollute
Might as well use Zoom instead
No.
As the AI said, the l in "LLM" (Large Language Model) stands for lntelligence. (Notice the "l" is a lowercase l).
So, AI is very lntelligent. Gotta give it props for that.
Therefore, AI is very dumb
Going by US laws (life + 70 years), all of Picasso's art is all still copyright protected in the US until 2043, so it's even less of a difference than you may realize.