theacharnian

joined 1 year ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 hour ago

Can you please give an example?

[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 0 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

So what does "fixing" look like? Are you saying France should go in Haiti, and ...start building infrastructure, creating and funding a civil service, create, support and uphold state institutions etc? Because, in that case, um, you just invented colonialism.

[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 1 points 11 hours ago

Who said that civil disobedience is not force?

Regardless, we always need a combined arms approach, a ... diversity of tactics if you will...

[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 14 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Cool. Now do Northern Cyprus. What do you mean "no"?

 

Turns out Abbé Pierre was a creep... This is like learning Mohter Theresa was a sexual predator.

[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

My understanding is that the overall argument for international law is not primarily its enforceability, but the definition of norms that let states pressure each other in a particular direction.

Note also that the US has never recognized the ICC to begin with.

But the US is not the only player. EU countries tend to also pollute a lot but also tend to be more international law oriented. This then reverberates in many other parts of the world.

In all, don't expect the crime of ecocide to cause heads to roll and don't put too much faith in it, but also don't underestimate it's value as a political tool.

[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

"Israeli investment and real estate fair"? Any chance they are selling real estate in illegal settlements in that one?

[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 days ago (2 children)

The entire history of civil disobedience begs to differ.

Protests are how people make the government respect them.

[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 days ago

So, you mean climate protest is working, it's becoming actually dangerous to the system.

[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 days ago

Hey, this is great citizen journalism.

[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 days ago

That flower is not an actual national symbol of Greece, even if its stylized representations are ubiquitous in ancient decorative arts. The national plants are the olive and the laurel.

[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 4 points 4 days ago

Well I'm crying now.

[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 3 points 4 days ago

Ah ! ça ira, ça ira, ça ira !

 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ca/post/28449417

Canadian mega landlord using AI ‘pricing scheme’ as it massively hikes rents

14
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by theacharnian@lemmy.ca to c/anarchism@slrpnk.net
 

Discussions about scarcity and anarchism that I've seen online seem to always talk about "scarcity in the large", i.e. how does an anarchist society allocate production, food, labour, materials etc.

I've a question about anarchism and scarcity in the small. Say, a really nice location, eg. a breezy location in a very hot climate, or the room with the nice windows in the community centre, or Bag End at the top of the hill. Say, an anarchist community has decided to use the location for purpose X, but a minority wants to use it for purpose Y. Maybe an even smaller minority wants to do Z, and a bunch of other people have their own little ideas about how to use it. Some are transient and could be accommodated (you get it on Tuesdays 5-7) but others might not be ("our sculpture project needs to dry out in that specific spot for the next 4 months, we know it blocks the view but it's the only place the breeze hits just right!") or could be contradictory (the siesta people vs the loud backgammon players can't both use the spot at high noon) or antagonistic (the teenagers who want to party late vs the new parents who need quiet for the babies). And dis-association doesn't really help here because that's the nice spot for many kilometers around or there is literally no way to create another beach for our small island community because that's literally the only place on the island where sand exists, so we can't just off and leave. (* Many of these examples are imagining a hot summer in an anarchist Greece, sorry it's almost August.)

It looks to me like a simple non-life-and-death scenario like this could potentially completely poison and destroy a community and in the face of that it would be the little death of anti-authoritarian organizing. Like yea, when life and death matters are at hand, anarchists will band together and conquer the bread. But petty small-scale little shit where it's managing annoyances and small grievances, I don't think non-authoritarian decision making can solve. And I suspect it's crap like this that has killed off many intentional communities and experiments or made them veer away from non-hierarchical, anti-authoritarian organizing.

Have anarchist thinkers seriously thought of this?

 

Submitting for this truly astonishing quote:

" Landlords in Quebec, however, feel they need to catch up to other provinces as Quebec is still one of the most affordable places to live in the country, said Jean-Olivier Reed, a spokesperson for the Quebec Landlord Association (APQ)."

 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ca/post/23000968

Incapables de trouver du travail en français au Nouveau-Brunswick, ils pensent partir au Québec

 
view more: next ›