sugartits

joined 1 year ago
[–] sugartits@lemmy.world 6 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

What has encryption got to do with it?

Most of telegram is not encrypted. There are unencrypted channels on telegram right now hosting child pornography. Telegram never removes them.

[–] sugartits@lemmy.world 6 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Trust us, we are printing all this money for your own good.

Your. Own. Good.

Something like that I assume.

[–] sugartits@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

Nothing. There is literally no legitimate use I can think of

[–] sugartits@lemmy.world 15 points 4 days ago (4 children)

The thing about humans are: we are frighteningly clever

Let me introduce you to Facebook.

[–] sugartits@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

At least it's technically on topic this time

[–] sugartits@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago (3 children)

the real crime here is that the date was wrong

[–] sugartits@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

When it came to the Ukraine situation, he has, in general, not missed a beat.

The UK has given an impressive amount of gear to the Ukrainians given the size of the UK military, whilst everyone else was dithering and wondering what to give and how much to ensure they still had some stuff at home, the UK attitude was "give them all the things and we'll worry about it later".

Obviously countries like Poland had to be more cautious.

A lot of training and intelligence has been given to Ukraine as well. The UK continues to host Ukrainian troops for training.

The UK even made binding "boots on the ground" support agreements to Norway and Sweden in case Russia tried anything during their NATO membership process.

UK gave a bunch of Challenger 2 tanks with "do what you like with them" terms, not just "pwease don't shooty shoot on Wussian tewwitory" nonsense. This was a token gesture as actually Ukraine really wanted the German stuff but it opened the door a bit to basically embarrass Germany into getting it's act together.

As much as I don't like the man, Johnson did well when it came to supporting Ukraine, and credit should be given where it is due.

[–] sugartits@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

As a fellow wanker, I take offense to that.

[–] sugartits@lemmy.world -1 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] sugartits@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Logic

Please explain your reasoning.

Others have done this and you seem to be ignoring them, so not sure what the point of you asking is.

Go look at some of the code that AI is powered by. It's just parameters. Lots and lots of parameters. Then the output from that is inevitable.

For the same reason I can't get a date with Michelle Ryan: it's a physical impossibility.

Huh?

If you're too lazy to even look up the most basic thing you don't understand, then I guess we're done here.

[–] sugartits@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (2 children)

You cannot convince something that has no consciousness

Why not?

Logic.

It's an matrix of weights that answers based on the given input + some salt

And why can't that be intelligence?

For the same reason I can't get a date with Michelle Ryan: it's a physical impossibility.

view more: next ›