Well today I learned, thanks for the correction.
subignition
They're pretty reasonable for consensus-based programming prompts as well like "Compare and contrast popular libraries for {use case} in {language}" or "I want to achieve {goal/feature} in {summary of project technologies}, what are some ways I could structure this?"
Of course you still shouldn't treat any of the output as factual without verifying it. But at least in the former case, I've found it more useful than traditional search engines to generate leads to look into, even if I discard some or all of the specific information it asserts
Edit: Which is largely due to traditional search engines getting worse and worse in recent years, sadly
~~The "P" is for predictive, not pre-trained. Generative Predictive Text~~
Edit: Nope I was wrong.
This is the best article I've seen yet on the topic. It does mention the "how" in brief, but this analogy really explains the "why" Gonna bookmark this in case I ever need to try to save another friend or family member from drinking the Flavor-Aid
As long as it has good writing... and maybe they turn down the crudity a touch... I think it has the potential to be well-received.
There are some very big claims in that post. If half that stuff turns out to be true it might be the end for Telegram.
What are some of the popular Matrix clients that you've seen have this problem? And are they open source?
I've been curious about Matrix for a while as a potential Discord replacement, but haven't actually tried it. Might be interesting to check it out and see whether I can contribute to one of the clients somehow.
So sorry you're going through it. Hoping you can find the strength to polish up your resume and spend some time on your days off looking for a better place to work. The best time to be looking for a job is when you already have one.
Darkness in science often means mystery. But mysteries can be answers in and of themselves—at least, until you dig even deeper.
Dark, darker, yet darker...
I think it's a bit of a stroke of genius on the article author's part, because it's a great double entendre the way it's written.
Damn, you're living in the future. I'm still stuck using three shells.