plm00

joined 4 months ago
[–] plm00@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 months ago

What I was referring to is called a Bind Mount, where host directories are exposed to the docker container. You may be fine if it's an external hard drive. I use bind mounts because they're easier to back up, but I acknowledge they are less safe.

You may be perfectly fine as you are now. My (and others) suggestions are for added security. As it stands, if there's no target on your bind, the only bad traffic you'll get are from bots trying to pick away at your domain and sub domains. Generally they're not a problem. But being extra safe costs nothing but time.

[–] plm00@lemmy.ml 17 points 3 months ago

You went and got my hopes up.

[–] plm00@lemmy.ml 30 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I've had a decent experience with Tuta.

[–] plm00@lemmy.ml 18 points 3 months ago (2 children)

"Secure" and "exposed" are antonyms in this scenario, that's the nature of the beast. I use Nginx which I have a domain pointing to. Worst case scenario, a hacker brute forces access to my container and mucks around within the confines. As I understand from a WireGuard VPN, there's an added level of security. You have to use the VPN to get access to your home ports, and then you can access your Docker containers as configured. There's an added layer of security.

Some things to consider:

  • Do you have a target on your back?
  • Does your container contain sensitive data?
  • If so, does your container have access to external directories?
  • Does your project have security options like Geo Blocking, rate limiting, etc?

I've been running some local servers for a few years only behind Nginx. So far nothing bad has happened. But that doesn't mean something bad couldn't happen later.

[–] plm00@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I'm betting the ban will either be undone, or an alternative will fill the void very quickly.

[–] plm00@lemmy.ml 45 points 3 months ago

surprised pikachu face

[–] plm00@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 months ago

Something important to remember is how many great franchises or games were originally made by a very small (or "indie") team. Zelda, Tetris, Mario, Minecraft, Sonic, Civ, and others. Each eventually either grew massively or were bought out by a bigger corporation later. Indie games may not be our savior, but so many mainstream games started out small. It seems to me that the smaller the team, the bigger the innovation.

Somebody is gonna try to fact check me on this, so I'll just say my point is you can't have a healthy gaming industry without a healthy indie industry too, IMHO.

[–] plm00@lemmy.ml 7 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I'm also a stranger without a source, but I recall seeing a YouTube video about it years ago, either a news story or documentary. I don't know if the exact numbers are right but I remember the other details. I'll have to see if I can find it.

Update: no idea. Can't find the original video. The one I remember, the guy had been awake the whole time but a nurse had figured out how to communicate with him through eye blinking, he remembers his mom's senseless comment years previous. OP might be mixing stories. I do vaguely remember ghost boy though.

[–] plm00@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Stardew is on Play Pass. If you start a free trial, you could test the game's performance.

[–] plm00@lemmy.ml 12 points 3 months ago

Sauerkraut! Used to be toilet cheese, now it's a delicacy that's earned its place on my sandwiches.

[–] plm00@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

Isn't NMS already a kind of harvesting and crafting Minecraft simulator in space? Or is it the blocks?

view more: ‹ prev next ›