You don't want the government to police advertisements to kids, like we already do with television.
Instead, you think Darwinism should police them with death? Really?
petrol_sniff_king
joined 1 year ago
... What argument?
Neither OP nor GameChild has made an argument. They've just said things.
"Cheese is delicious."
"No, it's not."
"Damn, my argument was flipped on its head."
What are you talking about?
True, but it encompasses a lot of people.
Nope.
When you're talking about demographics, you do not need to carve out exceptions for every single little outlier—it would be useless to talk about them otherwise.
A man expressing masculinity? “That’s violently toxic!”
Okay, I have to imagine you're here in bad faith because anyone who understands toxic masculinity would not phrase it this way.
I'm not sure I agree, but I'm also not sure what you're talking about.
Is there a view that dark skinned people are more masculine? I might accept less feminine; such a view would serve the purpose of making the violence against them easier for people to stomach.
It's clear.
Out of curiosity, how did you feel about man vs bear?
harks back to racist ideas of "uncultured savages"
Does it? Does it really?
What are you referring to?
Well, Shadow is strawberry ghirardelli, so I think it'll be pretty easy.
Oh, I'm well aware.
I wrote up a long reply to someone who essentially said "emojis don't add meaning" about how this willful, and I do mean willful, ignorance about a medium of communication is kind of like rejecting the invention of technicolor film for being a frivolous gimmick. It's a silly position to have, and I might even argue anti-intellectual.
Buuut I didn't want to seem like I was picking on the poor guy, so I didn't send, haha.
You are projecting your insecurities, my guy.
Like, you're over here complaining about hypergamy at the same time that you're whining about this very pedophilic "hit the wall" business. What's wrong with being 35, exactly? Won't you be 35 one day?