Hey all! My team at work is struggling with growing pains of getting into a formalized review process, so I was wondering if any of you guys have some things to live or die by in your code reviews. How much of it is manual, or how much is just static code analysis + style guide stuff, etc?
So we use that, and that works well. What does your peer review process look like? Is it pretty loosy-goosy, or do you have hard and fast guidelines and checklists?