oxysis

joined 3 weeks ago
[–] oxysis@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 4 hours ago

One I am all for

[–] oxysis@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 5 hours ago

I absolutely agree these “researchers” deserve to lose their tenure and lose their funding. In my mind they don’t even deserve to be called researchers anymore as they view their job as an extractive one. They hold no regard for the people they impacted and how that impacts the entire fields of research.

If the university does protect these people than I can only hope that no one signs up to participate in any future studies they try to conduct.

[–] oxysis@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 5 hours ago

It sickens me how people use the phrase to justify harming others.

[–] oxysis@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 5 hours ago

There are very good reasons why our modern code of ethics exist in the first place. We as researchers are not there to do harm but instead to try to uplift the people we work with in the process. We are not there to extract information, but to work with people to help better understand how to improve their lives.

The Milgram Experiment while fascinating, is deeply unethical in its own right and should not be used as an example of anything other than the damage that is cause by conducting an unethical study. That study alone has cause many would be participants to walk away because how can they be trusted with a new study. The experiment was not stopped by the researchers when it was clear the participants were under high pressure and showing visible signs of stress. This is not an extractive field like you imply, it is a morally bankrupt philosophy to have that mindset.

Compensating participants is a sign of goodwill and shows you value their time and work put in. Does not matter if trauma is brought up or created like with the Milgram Experiment. You do it because it creates goodwill and helps people feel safer in the knowledge that both you and the institution you represent actually care. It is not for debate on what circumstances you offer compensation, you just offer it.

The greater good does not come with predatory extractive experiments but instead with studies that value and care for its participants. It is impossible to know just how many people have been turned away from participating because of studies like the one the article is on, the Milgram Experiment and the Stanford Prison Experiment. What we do know is that they have had an extremely negative effect on the perception of academic research and turn people away.

[–] oxysis@lemmy.blahaj.zone 25 points 18 hours ago (6 children)

This is deeply unethical, when doing research you need to respect the people who participate and you have to respect what their story is. So by using a regurgitative artificial idiot (RAI) to make them their mind is not respecting them or their story.

The people who are being experimented on were not given compensation for their time and the work they contributed. While it isn’t required it is good practice in research to not actively burn bridges with people so that they will want to participate in more studies.

These people were also not given knowledge they were participating in a study nor were they given the choice to leave with their contributions at their will. Which entirely makes the study unpublishable since the data was not gathered with fucking consent.

This isn’t even taking into account any of the other things which cross ethical lines. All the “researchers” involved should never be allowed to ever conduct or participate in a study of any kind again. Their university should be fined and heavily scrutinized for their work in enabling this shit. These assholes have done damage to all researchers globally who will now have a harder time pitching real studies to potential participants because they could remember this story and how “researchers” took advantage of unknowing individuals. Shame on these people and hope they face real consequences.

[–] oxysis@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

I had an issue with this a few weeks ago, my old phone the charging port broke and I couldn’t get back into it. On my new phone it needed me to use the authenticator to log in to the authenticator. Made it my uni’s problem to solve the authenticator paradox

[–] oxysis@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

I’ll show this to my Umbreon plushie when i get home later

[–] oxysis@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

Then upgrade from 64gb to 128gb because it’s still not enough for my adhd

[–] oxysis@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 1 day ago

Ah some much needed good news

[–] oxysis@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It’s kind of hard to not worry about something that directly affects how I get to live. It’s a lot easier for people who are not having their access to HRT taken away to say “just don’t let them live rent free in your head”. Like I’m sorry but I need to be informed if I’m going to lose the thing that saved my life.

I don’t live in a blue state, I don’t have the money to move to one. I have to read the news daily because I’d rather not miss the news that I might be forced to flee the country. It’s not really as comforting as it sounds to say that there are people who care about trans rights when an even larger group wants us dead and gone.

Thanks for trying but it didn’t really help at all

[–] oxysis@lemmy.blahaj.zone 18 points 1 day ago (4 children)

It was nice not entirely hating my body for a while, but now they are gonna take away my brief bit of not hating myself.

[–] oxysis@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 1 day ago

There is one need that has to do with it, the need to keep the line going up. Cause once it falls then heads will roll

view more: next ›