owf

joined 1 year ago
[–] owf@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ich hatte son Ding (aber Dreirad also noch tiefer).

Du wirst auch gerne übersehen (auch mit Fahne) und es kam mir immer besonders beängstigend vor, da du von so einem Rad nicht springen kannst wie von einem Gewöhnlichen. Du siehst auch wenig im Vergleich, da du natürlich auf einem Liegerad nicht über Autos sehen kannst.

Dafür hatte das Ding tatsächlich eingebaute Vorfahrt. Wenn du doch gesehen wirst, halten die Leute gerne an, um zu glotzen.

[–] owf@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

That's not the Vivoactive cycling app.

[–] owf@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago

Nah you’re right and this person has obviously never used a Garmin.

You mean that you didn't bother to read my comment properly before personally attacking me. Let me guess, you're from Reddit.

[–] owf@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago

I only cycle, so I couldn't comment on the other apps.

[–] owf@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

They were Vivoactives. They had pace, not average speed.

Regardless of what the focus of the watch is, the cycling app should show cycling stats.

It's incredibly low effort to get something so basic wrong.

[–] owf@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago

I said average speed. Learn to read.

[–] owf@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago (10 children)

Apple Watch.

I had a couple of Garmins before and the difference is night and day. The Apple Watch isn't perfect, but it's clear that a lot of thought went into it.

The Garmins on the other hand, were lowest of low effort.

They blatantly didn't talk to even a single cyclists while building their cycling app.

Cyclists use average speed, not pace. Even the junkiest $3 cycle computer from Ali Baba gets this right, but not Garmin. They just copy-pasted the running screen.

view more: ‹ prev next ›