octoperson

joined 1 year ago
MODERATOR OF
3
submitted 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) by octoperson@sh.itjust.works to c/autism@lemmy.world
 

(first post)

Thanks to everybody who took part. Now it's time to see the results. I've counted up everyone's agreements and disagreements (using some amount of reading between the lines. I didn't count any that were unclear). The 'autistic' answer for each statement is indicated with bold type:

statement agree disagree
I often notice small sounds when others do not. 23 0
When I’m reading a story, I find it difficult to work out the characters’ intentions. 5 1
I find it easy to "read between the lines" when someone is talking to me. 0 6
I usually concentrate more on the whole picture, rather than the small details. 0 4
I know how to tell if someone listening to me is getting bored. 2 4
I find it easy to do more than one thing at once. 1 4
I find it easy to work out what someone is thinking or feeling just by looking at their face. 1 5
If there is an interruption, I can switch back to what I was doing very quickly. 3 4
I like to collect information about categories of things. 5 2
I find it difficult to work out people’s intentions. 4 0

So, lemmy.world/autism picked the autistic option every time and scored a perfect 10/10. Interestingly, if we weight it proportionately according to how many picked each option, we only get 6.2, barely over the threshold.

Scores of 6 or over indicate possible autism spectrum disorder, so lemmy.world/autism should seriously consider the possibility that they may be autistic.

(Personally, I got 8. Go me!)

My intentions for running this test was it would be interesting and fun, and I think it was (One respondent was concerned I might have some undisclosed professional interest - I don't, but thanks for looking out for the community). I think the main takeaway is that interpreting self-report questions can be really hard.

Should I do another? If so, should I do anything differently?

1
submitted 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) by octoperson@sh.itjust.works to c/bjork@sh.itjust.works
 

Björk and Rosalía are donating all their rights to income generated by this song to the AEGIS non-profit organisation to combat open pen fish farming in Iceland. Their record companies have agreed to do the same. All funds raised will support legal fees for protesters, taking action to stop the development of intensive farms that harm wildlife, deform fish, and pose risks to salmon's DNA and survival. Immediate action is crucial.

donate directly at: https://www.bjork.com/aegis

[–] octoperson@sh.itjust.works 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

For those 'people often say...' questions, there's huge cultural variations in how acceptable it is to even talk about one's personal traits. 'people say I am very blunt' - sorry I don't know anyone blunt enough to say that.

In your case, I think you'd answer Agree for this question. It's not up to you to tease out if it's the result of condition X or condition Y. And your health provider shouldn't be making that determination based purely on which option you picked on a self-report questionnaire.

 

This is one of a series of discussion posts based on questions from the AQ-10 autism test.

10. I find it difficult to work out people’s intentions.

  • Definitely Agree
  • Slightly Agree
  • Slightly Disagree
  • Definitely Disagree

Is this statement true for you? Can you think of any examples? Is it an easy or difficult question for you to answer?

You can take the full AQ-10 test here. Note this test is intended as a quick screener, and cannot diagnose or rule out any condition on its own.


First post in this series
next post (conclusion and results)

1
submitted 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) by octoperson@sh.itjust.works to c/liftoff@lemmy.world
 

There is (as far as I know) no easy way to copy a user handle to mention them in a post or comment. There isn't a UI element or menu option on a post to do this. I can go to their just page and use the share button, but then I get (for example):

https://lemmy.guide/link?target=@zachatrocity@sh.itjust.works

That's not Zach's instance, it's mine. To get the user handle I'd have to edit out the URL part, and change to the correct instance @zachatrocity@lemmy.world.

Is that how it's supposed to work? Is the instance change thing a bug? Is there a better way I don't know about?

 

This is one of a series of discussion posts based on questions from the AQ-10 autism test.

9. I like to collect information about categories of things.

  • Definitely Agree
  • Slightly Agree
  • Slightly Disagree
  • Definitely Disagree

Is this statement true for you? Can you think of any examples? Is it an easy or difficult question for you to answer?

You can take the full AQ-10 test here. Note this test is intended as a quick screener, and cannot diagnose or rule out any condition on its own.


First post in this series
next post

 

This is one of a series of discussion posts based on questions from the AQ-10 autism test.

8. If there is an interruption, I can switch back to what I was doing very quickly.

  • Definitely Agree
  • Slightly Agree
  • Slightly Disagree
  • Definitely Disagree

Is this statement true for you? Can you think of any examples? Is it an easy or difficult question for you to answer?

You can take the full AQ-10 test here. Note this test is intended as a quick screener, and cannot diagnose or rule out any condition on its own.


First post in this series.
next post

 

This is one of a series of discussion posts based on questions from the AQ-10 autism test.

6. I find it easy to do more than one thing at once.

  • Definitely Agree
  • Slightly Agree
  • Slightly Disagree
  • Definitely Disagree

Is this statement true for you? Can you think of any examples? Is it an easy or difficult question for you to answer?

You can take the full AQ-10 test here. Note this test is intended as a quick screener, and cannot diagnose or rule out any condition on its own.


First post in this series
next post

 

In Fern Brady's song, she says John Kearns is obsequious and Dara is an imbecile. But, then when they talk about it in the studio she says John isn't obsequious but Dara is. So then why did she write the song that way?

My thought was: if she calls Dara obsequious, then she has to call John an imbecile*. At the time she still didn't know that John had been purposefully trying to lose in the team task. Maybe she suspected he had genuine cognitive impairments, and it wouldn't be ok to joke about it?

(*There were also 2 other teammates, and the 2 hosts that she could have substituted into that line. My thinking here is that, since she had already worked with 2 of the teammates, she felt it was right for the song that they were the ones to get dissed individually.)

 

This is one of a series of discussion posts based on questions from the AQ-10 autism test.

5. I know how to tell if someone listening to me is getting bored.

  • Definitely Agree
  • Slightly Agree
  • Slightly Disagree
  • Definitely Disagree

Is this statement true for you? Can you think of any examples? Is it an easy or difficult question for you to answer?

You can take the full AQ-10 test here. Note this test is intended as a quick screener, and cannot diagnose or rule out any condition on its own.


First post in this series
next post

[–] octoperson@sh.itjust.works 0 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

How do I even with this question? The whole picture is made up of small details, and the details are all in the context of the whole picture. So it's both. The answer is both and it depends on what the thing is and why you're having to concentrate on it and where you are in that process. Any project you work on will need big picture perspective to decide what things you need to do, and also need detail perspective to do those things. Any field of study will have its overarching themes and its individual examples.

Let's look another way. I know they're not talking about a literal picture (and why use metaphors in an autism test of all things?), but let's pretend they are. When I look at The Hay Wain I see an idyllic rural scene. Then I see the cart, the house, the horsemen, the dog. I see the whole picture first, then I pick out details. When I look at The Persistence of Memory, I see the face, the clock, the tree, the cliff. Then I wonder what it could mean. I see the details, then (try to) assemble a full picture. It depends. It always flipping depends.

If It gave me specifics, I could answer this. But I'm just floundering with this sort of generality. I am leaning towards Slightly Disagree, only because I am crying out for details trying to interpret this question.

 

This is one of a series of discussion posts based on questions from the AQ-10 autism test.

4. I usually concentrate more on the whole picture, rather than the small details.

  • Definitely Agree
  • Slightly Agree
  • Slightly Disagree
  • Definitely Disagree

Is this statement true for you? Can you think of any examples? Is it an easy or difficult question for you to answer?

You can take the full AQ-10 test here. Note this test is intended as a quick screener, and cannot diagnose or rule out any condition on its own.


First post in this series.
next post

 

This is one of a series of discussion posts based on questions from the AQ-10 autism test.

3. I find it easy to "read between the lines" when someone is talking to me.

  • Definitely Agree
  • Slightly Agree
  • Slightly Disagree
  • Definitely Disagree

Is this statement true for you? Can you think of any examples? Is it an easy or difficult question for you to answer?

You can take the full AQ-10 test here. Note this test is intended as a quick screener, and cannot diagnose or rule out any condition on its own.


First post in this series.
next post

[–] octoperson@sh.itjust.works 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

We can put you down as a Definitely Agree then? 😁

 

This is one of a series of discussion posts based on questions from the AQ-10 autism test.

2. When I’m reading a story, I find it difficult to work out the characters’ intentions.

  • Definitely Agree
  • Slightly Agree
  • Slightly Disagree
  • Definitely Disagree

Is this statement true for you? Can you think of any examples? Is it an easy or difficult question for you to answer?

You can take the full AQ-10 test here. Note this test is intended as a quick screener, and cannot diagnose or rule out any condition on its own.


First post in this series.
next post

[–] octoperson@sh.itjust.works 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Did you know YAML is a recursive acronym? It stands for 'YAML AML MAML LAML'

[–] octoperson@sh.itjust.works 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I'm sure the dog would like to thank you for noticing

[–] octoperson@sh.itjust.works 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Ooh good thought. Like employment / legal / child custody type problems. That would make me a lot happier with the question (and mad that it's necessary)

[–] octoperson@sh.itjust.works 0 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Yeah words are tools for thinking and they're so valuable, in a way that's hard to quantify to other people. In my current situation of self-suspecting, it's like I've been shown the tools, but I have to use them sneakily because I haven't been given permission.

[–] octoperson@sh.itjust.works 0 points 10 months ago (4 children)

Alternate question: what impact did your diagnosis, confirmed or otherwise, have on your life?

[–] octoperson@sh.itjust.works 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

A nazi is a member of the NSDAP

Sorry, nobody understands that word in such narrow terms. A nazi is someone who promotes Nazi objectives and Nazi ideology. If the claims on his Wikipedia page are fair, then Asberger was absolutely and enthusiastically a nazi.

[–] octoperson@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Path that maximises time would be some kind of space-filling curve. Maybe it does that off panel?

[–] octoperson@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I would walk into those pillars multiple times per day

[–] octoperson@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not really. If more material falls in, its mass and size increases (the volume increases faster than the mass, which is why it's so unexpectedly low density in the first place), but otherwise it just sort of sits there.

Over the very long term, it will evaporate away by Hawking radiation. But that's a very very slow process. Like, long after everything else in the universe has ended.

view more: next ›