noride

joined 1 year ago
[–] noride@lemm.ee 5 points 1 day ago

I must say, I am quite the fan of your work around here.

[–] noride@lemm.ee 7 points 1 day ago

We don't talk about the event!!

[–] noride@lemm.ee 21 points 1 day ago

That's a 10% dip before the market even opens. Opening bell is going to be fun this morning!!

[–] noride@lemm.ee 14 points 2 days ago

Cops are overwhelmingly bags of shit, and will use every available opportunity to demonstrate that fact, as we see here.

That said, I really think fines for traffic violations should be based on income. The guys total nonchalance at having been caught doing 60 in a 45(?) just smacks of wealth privilege. As it stands, fines only serve to yoke the poor, and do nothing to curb dangerous behavior from those who can easily afford the infraction.

[–] noride@lemm.ee 14 points 2 days ago

He tried so hard to save Artax... 😭

[–] noride@lemm.ee 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Are these in pots or in the ground? Those leaves look perfect, really nice one for sure.

[–] noride@lemm.ee 4 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

I guess given your response, you are asserting their managers are gatekeeping access? Do you have personal experience in that regard?

I ask because we have made a massive, and frankly dumb, push to get everyone and their mother to use ChatGPT at work, from C level down to the call centers. Our metrics show around %60 of queries come from male employees, despite only %30 of our global staff being male. Given that communications and access were given to all employees via the same global communications channels, we attributed that to more men being willing to try gimmicky new software than women, but I wonder if something else is at play...

[–] noride@lemm.ee -5 points 4 days ago (4 children)

I am having difficulty following this line of reasoning, can you please help clarify? Why would being forced to prove your worth dissuade you from using a productivity tool? Are you implying women likely don't have access to use it at all, or they don't trust the output because the stakes are too high?

[–] noride@lemm.ee 8 points 5 days ago

It's a security\legal risk to allow adhoc wireless networks within your environment, pretty much any organization above a certain size has the same restrictions.

You could theoretically allow anyone to access your router directly, which would let them bypass agreeing to the Acceptable Use Policy, for example, shifting liability back to the organization for that users behavior.

[–] noride@lemm.ee 77 points 5 days ago (15 children)

Not true, you're pumping their numbers up, which increases their valuation.

[–] noride@lemm.ee 23 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Any bets on how long it takes before this becomes a fetish?

[–] noride@lemm.ee 21 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Besides a wealthy tithing Christian, what loser pays 100k a year to hang out in a place you can't drink or use profanity?

view more: next ›