Here's what actual evidence looks like:
Now here's the "Uyghur Genocide"
Notice that all but one of those has photographic evidence of the defining feature of a genocide, the dead bodies.
Here's what actual evidence looks like:
Now here's the "Uyghur Genocide"
Notice that all but one of those has photographic evidence of the defining feature of a genocide, the dead bodies.
Is there any evidence in that wall of text or just a bunch of claims to have seen evidence?
I don’t need that kind of nonsense for an actual genocide because there are mountains of primary evidence.
How does that stop Harris from coming up with a sound economic plan?
Doesn't that make it even more important that she present a good plan?
Why is that the choice we need to make?
What stopped her from coming up with an economic plan that was better?
Why did she need to include the parts that were actively bad?
The US has specific sanctions against Ramzan Kadyrov and if Musk violated any of them he could be prosecuted for sanctions violations.
That would be separate from a prosecution under "succor to the enemy". As near as I can tell, that only comes into effect under the very specific case of declared wars and that sanctions alone, aren't sufficient.
It wasn't the topic of the thread and it's not germane to the question of evidence.
It is, at best, a distraction.