name_NULL111653

joined 1 year ago
[–] name_NULL111653@pawb.social 9 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Washing my hands, I use a $1 bottle of dollar store soap, feels pretty luxurious (I'm a broke university student and my codormatory had no soap before I bought it don't judge).

[–] name_NULL111653@pawb.social 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Of course I don't think it was written by an actual terf. But very similar things are often said by them, and I think there is a place for using satire like this. Satirical comics have been used in countless other political issues for hundreds of years (just look at the comics similar to this against King George). Why is it any different or any more "arrogant" in our case?

[–] name_NULL111653@pawb.social 3 points 1 week ago

And in a way, yes, "spite the haters" is a big part of it. Because the "haters" are in most cases actively abusing or discriminating against us, and we generally like to bring attention to such social issues. That's the point of political comics. I'd hardly call pointing out evil people and bringing them up as a joke "arrogant."

[–] name_NULL111653@pawb.social 4 points 1 week ago

These people exist. I've met them, my friends have met them, and I personally have been abused by them. This is not a strawman argument, it's a snarky comic aimed at real people who have hurt people like me. I don't see why attacking those people is "arrogant and attention seeking." Were not pretending to be victims, we're attacking people who have hurt us through humor and snarky remarks... a perfectly reasonable response I'd say. I also apologize for assuming you're one of those people, I was quick to jump to that conclusion when it looked like you were defending such actions...

[–] name_NULL111653@pawb.social 6 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Are you saying nobody actually does such things to us? It's all a strawman, nobody actually asks what's "in our pants"? Because I have most certainly encountered such people personally, and many of my friends have been harassed by them.

[–] name_NULL111653@pawb.social 2 points 1 week ago

I'm just in a particularly chaotic mood, given your original tone on this matter... I can ensure you I'm perfectly capable of holding a normal, intellectual debate (although this isn't the most convenient platform to do so). And yeah when people defend those who say my identity isn't valid, the same people who've harassed me and abused me physically and mentally during my childhood, I'm likely to get a bit confrontational at times.

[–] name_NULL111653@pawb.social 6 points 1 week ago (9 children)

Do you believe the person in the comic is justified in asking about the other individual's genitalia? The comic is aimed at such people. If you think that's weird and wrong, you're not the target of this comic. But I don't think it's arrogant at all to be mean to such people who think we should be discriminated against based on our genitalia.

[–] name_NULL111653@pawb.social 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The issue in the comic is this: a nonbinary person exists. Random bystander: "are you a man or woman?" NB: I'm neither. Bystander then proceeds to ask what genitalia they have, not taking "nonbinary" as a valid answer. Yes the enby in the comic was snarky about it. I wouldn't do that if someone was genuinely asking, but the comic suggests the bystander was being judgemental or otherwise a jerk about it. In which case yeah, I'm gonna be mean right back.

[–] name_NULL111653@pawb.social 7 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Thank you for the complement. I do believe I'm justified in telling people who believe I ought not to exist that they are, in fact, evil. If that's a problem for you, so be it. You're entitled to your opinion, doesn't mean you have the right to face no criticism or judgement for your views. Just as you have the right to say such things to me.

[–] name_NULL111653@pawb.social 5 points 1 week ago (14 children)

Actually this might be worth my time after all... I'm bored. So do tell me, why is it "haughty," "arrogant," etc. to exist as a nonbinary person...? Do you actually believe you have the right to ask me what genitalia I was born with and judge me accordingly?

[–] name_NULL111653@pawb.social 11 points 1 week ago (23 children)

Go. The fuck. Away. No I'm not giving you a reason, arguing with people like you isn't worth my time. Get lost, fucking nazi scum. You aren't welcome here.

 

So, with family anyways, despite all outside appearances Christians don't 'hate' a child who turns away. They still love the kid, but their religion teaches them that if they truly love them, they must do anything to make them come back to their religion - even abuse them hoping the kid breaks down and 'repents.' That's how twisted their doctrine is. It makes them commit atrocities in the name of love. And they're blind to it, because even when others point out how evil their abuse is, the doctrine teaches them that others will call "'good' (abuse) evil and 'evil' (acceptance) good." They truly believe they're helping. They believe that if their child is 'going to hell,' any amount of trauma and abuse with even a chance of preventing that is justified. It's not the people, it's the ideology. The very fundamentals of Christianity justify literally anything to convert a soul. It is fundamentally evil, all the way back to the moment Jesus died. Anything that claims to be better is no longer Christianity.

My source: The story of my life. A story of abuse and pain, of seeing my loving mother become a monster when I left the church. Forcing me to leave my unbelieving friends. Controling every part of my mind and beliefs to 'save' me. And seeing the atrocities that I committed under that same doctrine, and how I was blinded by it.

This needs to end. Christianity must end. The problem isn't the people - it's the doctrine. And until the moment that Christan doctrine is destroyed forever, it will never cease to turn more innocent, loving people - even my own mother - into monsters blinded by their evil.

view more: next ›