maximalian

joined 3 months ago
[–] maximalian@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

There're 2 conditions in my question. In the links the solutions described are partial, though. A part of a part. That is, "how to identify a keyword", "how to redirect if ...".

But how to actually put them all together? For instance, how to merge "if a keyword then redirect via a pre-specified, random sub-proxy"? How to them add into all that "otherwise, use no proxy"?

[–] maximalian@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 months ago
[–] maximalian@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (4 children)
  1. client -> HaProxy -> if keyword --> sub-proxy (random) -> website
  2. client -> HaProxy -> if no keyword --> website
[–] maximalian@sopuli.xyz -2 points 2 months ago

at what point should one have laughed?

 

I have a server (S-1) with HAProxy and a number of residential proxies (PR-s) as login-passwords-port. There're multiple users who will connect to the internet via S-1.

I want to have HAProxy to forward incomming traffic of the users via a random proxy amoung PR-s with 2 conditions:

  1. only when there's certain, pre-defined keyword in the URL, traffic must be routed via a proxy.
  2. In all other cases, it must go to a requested resource directly as is, without a proxy

How would I implement this?


(1) client -> HaProxy -> if keyword --> sub-proxy (random) -> website

(2) client -> HaProxy -> if no keyword --> website

 

In Squid config, is there any variable - %VAR - that contains the current unique request id or anything similar?

I'll need to pass that into an external script, for instance:

# squi.conf
auth_param basic program %REQUEST_ID(???) /etc/squid/my_auth.py

This may not be an authentication script, this is just an example.

I've searched but haven't found anything about it.

[–] maximalian@sopuli.xyz 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

The new vaccines generate lots of profits for the pharma. Therefore, what incentives will ALWAYS there be for the owners and creators of the vaccines? Not vacciness in general, but SOME vacciness, against SOME diseases-19.

Would or could they, the pharma, ever reveal that some vaccines, especially their own, especially the newest ones, may be harmful to people in any way? That they could cause delayed negatives consequences and side-effects?

Therefore, who, or ironically WHO, has all the incesitves to always try to prove that all the negative data about the newest vaccines is a lie? And "in fact, it's getting worse". Yeah, worse for the those manufacture the vacciness and try to jab people like pigs :)

This may not prove that they, the vaccines, are or may be indeed harmful. Or not that all of them, for all people, not against all the viruses. Nonetheless, the incentive of hidding the truth about this exists and for one side only.