These judges also don't live or conduct trade, especially with their neighbors being a global military power.
So these judges lack skin in the game. Asking Mongolia to arrest the leader of a neighboring country is the same as declaring war.
The media screaming they must do it, speaks volumes about their lack of IQ.
A FOSS app for digital payments, must have a company front to sign deals with country retail store chains. Although customer kyc can be avoided, the payments from the front company to retail chains would be thru a corporate structure.
... maybe convenience is the wrong path
The advantages of PoW crypto, over digital (and PoS), it's possible to force between seller and buyer:
With the goal of fostering our own private communities. Over time, might spawn a sub-culture, identity, and ultimately people hood.
There was no signs of foul play at Wells Fargo?
Oh! It was the weekend
I hope this is sarcasm
Currently trying to improve a popular Sphinx extension, sphobjinv. Can watch my daily pain here
If anyone is so inclined, please throw some litecoin my way
Li1S1eZzPHBGyc2Lfx93kCohM5qGYGo924
The litecoin will go towards my daily milk tea habit. Elephants work for peanuts, i work for milk tea.
aGPLv3 is a good business model. If companies are using your kit in their closed source projects, they need to pay you
donationware is abandonware. We brand it Apache2.0 or MIT
Not triggered by this emotional outrage bait
it either costs your time or money or both. There is no situation where anything is free.
I'm currently fixing, not mine, repos. I have the skill level to fix other coders design issues. One at a time.
This is costing me time. Not just in doing the work, but all the time leading up to gaining the skillset to be at this level.
Put a price tag on that. (i'm not boasting; actually having to do this grind)
So they are gaslighting to cause you to have doubts. So they are using a psyche which is a symptom of them having unrestricted access to your time and ears
AGPLv3 is not anti-business or anti-money. It's saying if you want to use the code in a closed source project you need to pay the copyright holder
The copyright holder is the original author, not a maintainer or someone who forked a project and renamed it.
That's why the #1 thing mentioned in copyleft licenses is you can't alter the copyright notice and declare yourself the original author
AGPLv3 is a good license to choose. All the other licenses are naive and do not combat closed source projects and the slave worker that keeps our projects unfunded
Exactly. They obviously didn't research licensing enough.
Closed source projects need to pay for licensing. Or they will force you to work for them designing web forms and smartphone apps
Am i wrong?
When is collaboration irrelevant within a large organization? Your company uses Linux which is commendable.
Taking it one step further
Multiple team members being able to work on the same project at the same time
Putin should take a tour of adjacent countries. Dare them to blind.
No adjacent country would declare war by arresting a visiting head of state.
No country became a country by having that level of lack of strategy. Simply does not exist.