lennivelkant

joined 4 months ago
[–] lennivelkant@discuss.tchncs.de 41 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

Most furries are harmless. A few are creeps with no concept of boundaries. Some are particularly deluded Nazis. Like every group of some size, they have a certain percentage of scum. Depending on your standards, they might be weird, but I'll take harmless weirdness over harmful normalcy any day, let alone harmful weirdness.

I do think he is unique, but also the prime specimen to show that not everything unique is valuable.

[–] lennivelkant@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 13 hours ago

Ich mag deinen Namen. Ich find den witzig. Dachte das könnte dich freuen.

[–] lennivelkant@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Given the heavy use of subject-specific jargon, I'd guess as much. I wouldn't go to the length of looking up neuroscience terms just to roast neuroscientists, because that just seems like a poor happy chemical return on the mental energy investment, whatever the proper terms for that might be.

Now, if you'd ask me to build a data model to analyse my unhappiness for key influencers, we're in business.

Or maybe he felt it was a funny implication to make. I know we sometimes have a reputation for being serious, but some of us are just good at deadpan deliveries.

Seems like a case where a particular claim of a select group was generalised over a supergroup by way of being the subject of memes that ran away with the stereotype.

It's like that one fraud falsifying studies about a specific type of vaccines in an attempt to sell his own, only for people to latch on to the "vaccine bad" part of the story without limit, nuance or critical examination.

Does anyone still know where the original "just friends" claim stems from, in which context, supported by which arguments, what refutations have been offered since and just how widespread among archaeologists it is today?

For the elites: conserve their hierarchy and the structures that enable the gradual accumulation of power in the hands of the few.

For the rest: conserve their place in the hierarchy and the comfort of the familiar.

I appreciate that you took the time to supply the nuances I omitted. While there is value in a positive framing, it's important to acknowledge potential struggles as well. We can't effectively tackle issues if we're not aware of them.

In any case, while I'm not qualified to help you with your difficulties, I hope you find - or have found - a way to work on overcoming them. Dealing with insecurities, from my own experience, can be a tough process, further amplified by setbacks and a lack of perceived progress. But if you persevere, even if you might not feel that you have improved much, you may find yourself looking back at a time when it was worse and, by contrast, see the progress you've made. May that hope, that your future self will look back and be proud of your hard work, give you the strength to keep going.

[–] lennivelkant@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Hourly wages for school teachers? I'm worried I might know the response, but does prep work outside school hours, in breaks etc. count as hours worked?

[–] lennivelkant@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I considered that option too, but opted to go with the more positive guess. I'm not qualified either way, I just wanted to say something nice.

[–] lennivelkant@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Imagine being the last (female, strictly matrilineal) descendant of one of her daughters: "If I die without a daughter, the line of Alice will end and that bitch Caitlin will become the new Eve!"

Hell, imagine fighting a secret war to extinguish the other line - now there's a "secret society conspiracy" plot if I've ever seen one.

[–] lennivelkant@discuss.tchncs.de 16 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Well, you sound like a team player. You place the common good (fun together) higher than individual ambitions (or maybe place your own worth very low, I can't tell from one sentence, but the outcome is the same).

Saying deliberately sounds like it's not just a thing that you find yourself doing again and again, but a conscious choice. That suggests there was a choice to make; that the option of playing a self-centered character was something you were actively aware of, but were sufficiently repulsed by it to make a point of being better than those people.

I think you're a nice person, empathetic, while not so entirely innocent as to not even consider the possibility, still principled and caring enough to actively defy it.

I think you're a net good for this world.

69
ich🥲iel (discuss.tchncs.de)
submitted 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) by lennivelkant@discuss.tchncs.de to c/ich_iel
 

Hab jetzt die Ursache für die Abstürze ermittelt. Ein Hochstrom-System hat bei einem Hochdatum eine brechende Änderung vorgenommen. Gut, dass ich mittlerweile geübt darin bin, ihr Änderungsprotokoll zu durchforsten, dann müssen sie mir nicht vorher Bescheid geben.

view more: next ›