knF

Usually people study a subject because they're at least interested in it. What you're saying is like asking a surgeon to work in IT, for instance, just because they're paying more. That's not a fair game, we're humans with our skills, perks, defects... you can't pretend everyone moves like a pawn just for money.

Boeing, like many other companies is playing the game of "maximise the short term profit" and as usual the easiest way is to cut labour costs. That's why they're in this position (poorly built planes, killed HUNDREDS of people etc.)

Thanks to everyone that has replied, all fair points. When you use (read, view, listen to...) copyrighted material you're subject to the licensing rules, no matter if it's free (as in beer) or not.

This means that quoting more than what's considered fair use is a violation of the license, for instance. In practice a human would not be able to quote exactly a 1000 words document just on the first read but "AI" can, thus infringing one of the licensing clauses.

Some licensing on copyrighted material is also explicitly forbidding to use the full content by automated systems (once they were web crawlers for search engines)

Basically all these possibilities or actual licensing infringements would require a negotiation between the involved parties.

This process is akin to how humans learn by reading widely and absorbing styles and techniques, rather than memorizing and reproducing exact passages.

Many people quote this part saying that this is not the case and this is the main reason why the argument is not valid.

Let's take a step back and not put in discussion how current "AI" learns vs how human learn.

The key point for me here is that humans DO PAY (or at least are expected to...) to use and learn from copyrighted material. So if we're equating "AI" method of learning with humans', both should be subject to the the same rules and regulations. Meaning that "AI" should pay for using copyrighted material.

I wish it was usable enough... loved BeOS and I really hope to have Haiku as my daily driver one day

I think you can achieve it with a reverse-proxy. Let's say that domain.com points at server 0, you'll have to put a reverse proxy that answers all calls. In the config of the reverse proxy you'll have to redirect the services based on the domain. I'm using Caddy and this example should work:

0.domain.com {
                        reverse_proxy http://X.X.X.X:8080
                      }
1.domain.com {
                        reverse_proxy http://Y.Y.Y.Y:8123
                        } 

And so on.

EDIT: Looks like I was late to the party! +1 to @greco reply as it's more complete and clear (especially on the risks of this approach)