The worst that will happen is a tax deductable fine. If you kill people but you do it for a corporation, nobody goes to prison.
jonne
joined 1 year ago
It went up a little, but nothing compared to the equivalent in rent you'd pay for the same place.
At least you can't get kicked out or have your rent raised for arbitrary reasons. Some renters are basically moving every year.
Defamation of the king in Thailand can be something benign like saying you'd prefer to have an elected President.
As for it being a democracy, they have elections, but the military will stop a party from taking power if they don't agree with them, like what happened last time.
Looks like it's also a variant of Synergy, so I guess it's just the same. There's a lot of different forks of it, I'm not sure which one is the 'best' these days.
I believe that was in New York, although I might be wrong about that.
Yeah, apparently it's ok to just make stuff up to make a point, so we'll just make shit up about JD Vance as that's how he wants things to be.
But it makes so much money for corporations! Tax payer money is used for research and everything else that costs money, then we get a private company to just 'commercialise' it! Tax payers take on all the risk and investment, profits go straight to shareholders.
This is about Ukraine invading Kursk, not the one where Russia invaded Ukraine. I picked this one specifically because Ukraine is also a US client state that is somehow treated differently when it comes to how it's reported on and what they're allowed to do with military aid.
The NY Times had no problem calling it an invasion when Ukraine did it to Russia (also after years of being bombed by Russia).
That's their target demo, so yeah, the campaign would probably file that under the strengths column.
So she can inherit a pile of debt?