janguv

joined 1 year ago
[–] janguv@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 6 days ago (2 children)

z spellings are pretty English, fwiw. The s thing only came in pretty belatedly, from the French. Z spellings are still very common in academic writing; OUP requires it in their style guide. There's no defence of defense though.

[–] janguv@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Right but this is an easy win for Starmer. Something very unpopular you can scrap, that is costly, that even if you're a bigot you can recognise isn't working, etc. That's something you can instantly do to create the impression you're very different to the previous party. And the impression, per your comment, is impactful. It really doesn't say much one way or the other about more important policies (e.g. like the Tory cuts that he said pre-election he would not axe).

[–] janguv@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I mean, the FPTP system is fucked – that aside... For your stat to be right, wouldn't you have to calculate it also in terms of the number of constituents to a given constituency? E.g., Constituency A has 10 constituents, Constituency B has 15 constituents, and Constituency C has 100 constituents; both A + B have a non-Lab/Cons party in first or second place; C has Lab first and Cons second. In that scenario, it wouldn't be true that "most people" live in a constituency where Lab or Cons are not both 1st or 2nd (where A-C is exhaustive).

I don't know how that would extrapolate to the real constituencies with their varying population/electorate figures. Certainly, it's a very uneven and strange system at present, which allows for all sorts of gerrymandering. But only given the sum of 20 constituencies (per your calculation) where Lab/Cons are not the top two, I don't think you can infer the situation for most people.

In any case: fuck this system, PR soon please.

[–] janguv@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It is an interesting project, not sure where it goes. The title is deeply misleading though. The features of ReVanced make YouTube so much better, whereas this project doesn't seem to be about making YouTube better so much as circumnavigating YouTube for the comment boxes and as your hub to creators. They seem to be doing different things.

[–] janguv@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 year ago

I'm in a restricted country and my phone is not rooted, so if I use ad block apps like AdAway or Adgaurd they need to create a VPN connection in order to function unless the phone is rooted, and that VPN connection doesn't let me to enable another VPN in order to visit filtered websites or apps.

Ultimately, I think rooting is the way to go, but only if you have a device with a decent XDA thread guide and support. If you choose not to root, Adguard has their own VPN service integrated if you wanted to pay for that (haven't tried), or else you can add your own proxy servers through the app – so you can add individual server IPs for (say) Nord and connect to them while still using Adguard in VPN mode.